Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
WAFFLING WHILE THE BULLETS FLY

The host of the weekly ABC TV panel discussion, Q&A, is Tony Jones, a gifted presenter who charts a cautious path between competing viewpoints. Last night Tony and his guests seemed overawed by the mild mannered US Ambassador, Jeff Bleich who chose his words so diplomatically that he barely said anything at all. And yet what he did say - especially for a former human rights lawyer - was the same old patriotic crap.

Despite the jolly smiles of the panelists, there was a hint of tension.  I wondered, was it because of the shadow cast by the recent exposure of US of war crimes in Baghdad as the show launched into a tedious discussion on the difficulties of being a politician's partner? On and on it went, an orgy of waffling, eliciting tears from the panelists and yawns from viewers.

Finally, a question from the audience raised the temperature.

From a HPD Correspondent 

 


LIAM DUNCAN: So the Government's put this blanket suspension on processing the claims of asylum seekers from Afghanistan, saying that the situation in Afghanistan may be changing. If the situation is changing to the point where we would suspend processing these claims, then why do we still have troops in Afghanistan?

US Ambassador JEFF BLEICH: Yes, there's a hot war going on. The question is whether people are fleeing Afghanistan because they have a well founded fear of persecution by the current Karzai government [doesn't he mean the Taliban?] or whether they're leaving for other reasons, economic or others, because of the conflict which is occurring there and I'm not going to weigh in on that.

TONY JONES: Let's go to this questioner down the front.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: In regards to the refugees coming to Australia, I think perhaps we should reframe this debate. Instead of focusing on border protection to focussing on addressing the root cause of the conflict - the root cause of the refugees, which is the conflict in Afghanistan. I mean estimates range between 30 and 60,000 civilians have been killed by US allied forces, so don't you think that Australia should focus on addressing that situation rather than “border protection”.

TONY JONES: Yeah, okay, Tanya Plibersek?

TANYA PLIBERSEK: How you take a country from years of oppression under a Taliban government through the birth of democracy and all of the complications that they've suffered in that moved to democracy to a period of peace is a very complicated question. I mean, I think everyone supports a peaceful outcome there sooner rather than later, but if you've got, you know, the single bullet, the silver bullet that gets us there, I'd be very surprised.

[Actually Tanya, we've got lots of silver bullets, plus gun-ships, drones, special ops, dudgeons, assassination squads…]

TONY JONES: takes another question from the audience:

BRIAN CONCANNON: Yeah, I'd like to ask the panel their thoughts about the slaughter of civilians and two journalists in Iraq by US soldiers in a helicopter. I'd like to know your thoughts. Do you think it was accidental or an expected casualty of war or possibly something more sinister?

TONY JONES: Jeff?

JEFF BLEICH: Oh, you know, I saw the footage that you're referring to and it's tragic and disturbing and I think the - you know, I don't know any of the answers to the questions that you're asking and because there was an investigation three years ago and the conclusion was that although there were mistakes made that it wasn't intentional and that it was a - I think the secretary of the Defence said, you know, it was one of these things that happens in the fog of war. What I can tell you is that the current administration is committed to two things: one is stressing the protection of civilian life and the second is transparency. If we make a mistake, people are going to know about it.

TONY JONES: Transparency, that's an interesting idea, transparency, because the US military tried to stop this video being shown. Tried very hard - because of the internet, they were unable to do that. Do you think in the end it was a good thing that it was shown?

JEFF BLEICH: You know, I think in the end people understand the consequences of war and this is graphic. I think it's hard on the families, I think it's hard on the people who were involved to see this but at the same time I understand that there is a - that it has increased public awareness and it has increased all of our commitment to, again, protecting civilian life and to assuring that if mistakes happen that we deal with them and we're honest about them.

TONY JONES: Let's hear from [Rupert Murdoch journalist] Greg Sheridan.

GREG SHERIDAN: Well, Tony, I would say that I agree with Kevin Rudd 100 per cent that throughout history, overwhelmingly, the United States has been a force for good, and I think the United States military overwhelmingly has been a force for good. Every American soldier I've known, and I've known a lot of American soldiers, has been a very fine human being and I can't tell you the number of occasions in south east in tsunamis in Aceh and all over the world where the happiest sight on the horizon is a US soldier. But any large body of men and women under extreme stress will make, sometimes, terrible mistakes and that happens in Iraq.

[And in Afghanistan too, Greg, almost every day. This one happened while you were talking: Read it in the Huffington Post, because it won't be in your newspaper:

"Afghans burned tires and chanted "Death to America" after U.S. troops fired Monday on a civilian bus near Kandahar, killing four people and wounding more than a dozen. Afghanistan's president accused NATO of violating its commitment to safeguard civilian lives. Nearly 200 Afghans blocked the highway where the shooting occurred, burning tires, firing weapons and chanting "Death to America".]

 

 

More Murders

 

 

TONY JONES: Let me put this to you: some commentators compared the [WikiLeaked] video to the first photos that came out of Abu Ghraib of the torture of prisons by American Troops. Could this have the same sort of impact in terms of public perceptions about the war?

GREG SHERIDAN: I don't think so, partly because the debate is a little more mature now [ie we are hardened to the slaughter] and understand that individual human beings make terrible mistakes but that doesn't of and in itself invalidate a whole thing - a whole enterprise. The other thing is that one of the lessons of Abu Ghraib is that they did come out in the American system - in the American justice system, in the New York Times, and I tell you what, that didn't happen much when Soviet troops were in Afghanistan. [Numerous Abu Ghraib images are still embargoed, hardly anyone has been held to account for the abuses and not not a single US torturer from the former administration has been prosecuted].

JEFF BLEICH: And, you know, if I can pick up on Tanya's point - you know, Tanya was saying, look, this is a tough conflict. It's not one that anyone invited. The Taliban took hold. They worked with Al-Qaeda, a terrorist network…

TONY JONES: Our questioner has his hand up again. And I'd just like to get a microphone to him. In the meantime, I want to hear from Tanya Plibersek on this issue.

TANYA PLIBERSEK: Wafle, waffle, waffle.

TONY JONES: I just want to go back to our questioner briefly.

BRIAN CONCANNON: Yeah, from the footage I saw, it was pretty obvious the cameras weren't guns at all. I believe the soldiers just used it as an excuse to outright murder them.

TANYA PLIBERSEK: Waffle, waffle, waffle

JEFF BLEICH: At the same time we shouldn't have the worst things that happen in a conflict colour our entire view of the conflict. We need to have some perspective on this, which is...

TONY JONES: And, yet, that's what happened with Abu Ghraib, because it seemed like we were getting information that no one knew about that took a layer away from basically the spin that you hear from politicians or the military, usually, and suddenly you see something raw and as it really is. Could that footage be similar?

JEFF BLEICH: No, I think, as Greg Sheridan said, we're more mature [hardened] about the situation right now. I think people understand that there is an effort right now to draw down Iraq. That we are establishing a more effective government and that it is a completely different world there now than it was three years ago…

[A few days ago five massive bombs hit apartment buildings across Baghdad, killing at least 39 people and wounding more than 130 .It was the fourth attack with multiple casualties across Iraq in five days, a spate of violence that has claimed more than 100 lives since Friday.]

TONY JONES: Let's just quickly hear from Joe Hockey on this. Did you see the footage, first of all, and, if so, your reaction to it...

JOE HOCKEY: Yeah. Look, I have...

TONY JONES: ...as a member of the government that actually took Australia to war.

JOE HOCKEY: Yeah, look, I have seen the footage. It's very disturbing footage. It reminds us of the price of war, which hasn't changed since the beginning of humanity, but what it should do is make us more vigilant and it should make us more transparent and I agree with Tanya it's actually good that the footage got out, because it reminds everyone that there is a very real cost to war.

TONY JONES: We've got one other person with their hand up. We'll hear from you and then we'll quickly move on.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: The history of US foreign policy has often been one of trying to reconcile America's political values with the reality of exercising a great power's power and so I'd like to hear the panel's view on how well America has done this in recent history and whether the Obama Administration is doing a better job of reconciling these competing values?

JEFF BLEICH: My view is that the United States tries to do that right thing. That has been the greatness of the country. Yeah, we make mistakes and we have had periods that we regret but over the long haul the motivations of the American people, the motivations of our leaders have always been to try and accomplish a better world...

JOE HOCKEY: Hear, hear.

JEFF BLEICH: ...a safer world, a cleaner world, a stronger world…

JOE HOCKEY: Hear, hear…

[A world where politicians refuse to count the dead and injured, and are barely aware that 4 million Iraqis have been displaced from their homes and …. but why go on?]

JOE HOCKEY: Hear, hear…

 

 

Afghan troops killed  [1] 8,587

 

Afghan troops seriously injured  [2] 25,761
 
Afghan civilians killed  [3] 8,309   Afghan civilians seriously injured  [4] 14,956
 
U.S. troops killed  [5] 914   U.S. troops seriously injured  [6] 2,742
 
Other coalition troops killed  [7] 647   Other coalition troops seriously injured  [8] 1,941
 
Contractors killed  [9] 75   Contractors seriously injured  [10] 2,428
 
Journalists killed  [11] 9   Journalists seriously injured  [12] unknown
 
Total killed

in Afghanistan:

18,541   Total injured

in Afghanistan:

47,828
 
 
 

# Casualties in Iraq: 

Iraqi troops killed  [13] 30,000   Iraqi troops seriously injured  [14] 90,000
 
Iraqi civilians killed  [15] 815,411   Iraqi civilians seriously injured  [16] 1,467,740
 
U.S. troops killed  [17] 4,376   U.S. troops seriously injured  [18] 31,616
 
Other coalition troops killed  [19] 318   Other coalition troops seriously injured  [20] 2,290
 
Contractors killed  [21] 933   Contractors seriously injured  [22] 10,569
 
Journalists killed  [23] 141   Journalists seriously injured  [24] unknown
 
Total killed

in Iraq:

http://paksiasat.com/2010/04/07/casualties-in-afghanistan-iraq/
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
U.S in Libya: Get shot by your own bullets
22 mar  |  By Sean Maguire

There are few people in this world who would defend Gaddafi as a sane and viable leader of Libya; but I think there would be even less that would see the logic in the U.S selling guns to someone as psychotic as him and then parading about as world police.

It's the equivalent of a sheriff giving an outlaw a six-shooter and then acting surprised when he starts popping off the town folk. 

The second one U.S plane gets shot down by one U.S surface-to-air missile, all the military big wigs should get together and make a decision once and for all - "we have to stop shooting at tyrants we've given guns to".

What do you think about Libya? What do you think about the obvious contradictions in U.S foreign policy and how do you think they should be addressed? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

One Sided Afghanistan War Debate
4 oct  |  By Stephen Myles

In Australia there will soon be a parliamentary debate into the war in Afghanistan; the idea of which in my mind (and in those who called for the debate) is to examine the morality, ethics and practicalities of the war and make an informed decision whether it's worthwhile.   . . read more

Fall of Empire, End to Wars: Johan Galtung Predictions
22 feb  |  Some analysts say the US - bogged down in wars and pressed by emerging powers - will have to rethink its role in world affairs. Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung, a peace and conflict expert, goes further by predicting the fall of the "US Empire". "Iraq is not at all turning out the way they hoped, certainly not Afghanistan either. The same will happen in Yemen and Somalia and a number of other countries where they now have undercover operations," he told RT. Moreover, the sociologist believes what is going to happen in those areas - for instance, in Afghanistan - is not even decided in Washington. . . read more
Joe Biden Tears Into Dick Cheney
15 feb  |  In a much-anticipated Sunday showdown between Vice President Joe Biden and his predecessor Dick Cheney, Biden has drawn first blood. . . read more
Bombs for peace? 'UN completely disgraced in Libya'
22 mar  |  Political writer Diane Johnstone gives her perspective on the ongoing Libyan conflict and the real reason NATO and the U.S are behaving as they are. An interesting analysis but occassionally she just states the obvious like when she says this war is for "regime change".

What do you think about her thoughts? Should the West be fighting such a war? Tell us and remember...Disqus!   . . read more

The year that wasn't, and why you're to blame
22 dec  |  When we look back over 2009 it will probably be remembered as a year that wasn't- a year that offered promises of change, hope and optimism but delivered zilch. Let's look at why- by Sean Maguire  . . read more
Are U.S. Forces Executing Afghan Kids?
6 jan  |  The Taliban suicide attack that killed a group of CIA agents in Afghanistan on a base that was directing US drone aircraft used to attack Taliban leaders was big news in the US over the past week, with the airwaves and front pages filled with sympathetic stories referring to the fact that the female station chief, who was among those killed, was the "mother of three children."- by DAVE LINDORFF . . read more
Rudd's second apology, just as pointless?
5 apr  |  By Sean Maguire

Apologising is a uniquely human action, it involves taking responsibility for a mistake and admitting you erred. In someways it also involves asking for forgiveness.

Kevin Rudd, Australia's former PM who was sacked by his own party last year, apologised last night for "killing" his Emissions Trading Scheme which he says brought about his downfall.

Whether this is true or not, his apology echoes another one he made in his first week in government. That "sorry" was to the aboriginal people of Australia who since British colonisation were oppressed, marginalied and literally stolen from their families. 

His apology in that instance was personal and was seen almost universally as a positive step towards reconciliation and healing. It didn't lead to a better livelihood for indigenous Australians and has to be seen now as a symbolic act without much substance behind it.

Hopefully this second apology for failing on climate change can lead to asking for real forgiveness by making some real progress.    . . read more

Our war in Afghanistan: Can it be won?
22 jul  |  This debate focuses on the outlook and the possibilities for Australia's military efforts in Afghanistan, and features two of the country's most qualified persons to speak about it: Maj. Gen. (Ret) Jim Molan and former Secretary of the Defence Department, Mr Paul Barratt.  . . read more
Inge Missmahl brings peace to the minds of Afghanistan
30 sep  |  Inge Missmahl brings peace to the minds of Afghanistan  . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)