Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Taking the liberals out of the Liberals- by Sean Maguire
Taking the liberals out of the Liberals- by Sean Maguire

With the surprise election of Tony Abbott as leader of the Liberal party, it would seem that carving out the party's identity and deciding a stance on the ETS would have become clearer.

Apparently not.

The margin of one vote for Abbott means that the once united and seemingly indestructible Liberal party remains fractured. They have within them, two almost equally numbered and diametrically opposed camps of climate change sceptics and believers that have come to impassable loggerheads.

So what should they do if they want to once again become an electable force?

In my mind, with the Nationals resolute on opposing the ETS and with a slim majority of the Liberal party now supporting a leader possessed by the same idea; perhaps it is time for the Liberal Party's small l-liberals to split from their conservative brethren and create a new centre party in the mould of the now defunct Australian Democrats. 

That third political party- one which was intent on moderation and the interrogation of Liberal and Labor- would create a much better balance for Australian Federal politics. A political system during the Rudd years which has sunk into the quagmire of both major parties battling to appear the most family centred and moderate.

Where has been the debate?

The last week has been the best example of how slim the political spectrum has become.

Turnbull- the opposition leader- having finally gotten a small majority of his party to agree to vote for the government's ETS then pushed for them to pass it through the Senate- even if he lost the leadership battle- because it would mean breaking a promise to Rudd.

A strange display from an opposition leader that can't find much to oppose in government policy.

What needs to happen for that political spectrum to widen is for a third political party to emerge; one which revitalises the ‘keep the bastards honest' mantra of the Democrats and one which focuses on the future, families and fiscal conservatism.

If they were then to write a few not-to-controversial and family focused policies a wedge would be created in Federal politics as Labor would be forced to either agree with the centrist position-and appear irrelevant-or they would have to strike up new positions a little further left. 

This would in theory create a political structure mirroring what Britain has long enjoyed with the Liberal Democrats as a third, and sometimes deciding force in political decisions.

It would also mean that the consolidated Liberal party under Tony Abbott- the self-confessed ‘ideological love child of Bronwyn Bishop and John Howard'- could create a strong and united vision.

Something that a lot of Australians would surely like to see.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
The Battle of Ideas - From Kevin Rudd
26 oct  |  Right now this country is engaged in a battle of ideas for Australia’s future. On the one side of this battle we have a vision for Australia’s future which says that, when it comes to economic prosperity, you cannot have economic prosperity and social justice — that these are incompatible.

There is another view, another vision — and it is our vision — which says that this nation and this people are at their best when we are a people and a nation committed to building a prosperous nation while at the same time not jettisoning our vision for a fair Australia and a fair society. In an absolute nutshell that is the divide between us — a view of the world which says it is about me, myself and I, and an alternative view which says that we are about an Australia which, sure, recognises that individual hard work, achievement and success are to be encouraged and rewarded but, at the same time, that we cannot turn a blind eye to the interests of our fellow human beings who are not doing well.

That has been the divide between us for a century and remains the divide between us today. Ideas in politics are important. They in fact affect everything that we do. They shape our vision of what is possible for the government to do for the nation. . . read more

Labor Party tell Australia 'Don't Go Back' with Abbott
1 dec  |  Having signed up to the Labor party's e-newsletters I've been receiving information on policies, 'informal' videos Rudd has made, and grandiose visions for the future. Today though there was a significant change in tone with the video below. Instead of considered and convivial, it is brutal and singular with the idea that Abbott is a dinosaur and a destructive force to a progressive Australia. The low image quality and speedy release would tell us this video has been made quickly. What's the rush? Is this because Abbott is a real threat to Rudd? Or just to the ETS? And how badly do they want Abbott dead and buried?  . . read more
Greatest Moments in Australian Politics
23 oct  |  Some highlights and lowlights in the careers of the recent crop of Australian politicians. . . read more
IQ² Debate: Too Many People Go to University- by Sean Maguire
11 nov  |  IQ² Debate: Too Many People Go to University- by Sean Maguire . . read more
Australian Defence Spending
24 oct  |  Australian Democrats leader Senator Lyn Allison calls on the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader to radically rethink defence spending in Australia. . . read more
An Australian Apology: Why the Greens Should Vote for the CPRS- by Derek Barry
30 nov  |  An Australian Apology: Why the Greens Should Vote for the CPRS- by Derek Barry . . read more
Keating breaches the Abbott-Proof-Fence- by Sean Maguire
16 mar  |  For even the most casual watcher of Australian politics the last few months have been depressing.

Tony Abbott, the self-styled ideological love-child of Bronwyn Bishop and John Howard has been playing some pretty petty party politics; stone-walling any Labor policy, regardless of its merits.

So step up Paul Keating, the ideological love-child of a brick wall and Jack Lang.

He has launched a vicious and burning attack on Abbott calling him an "intellectual nobody [with] no policy ambition", and the "poor man's John Howard".

Hard to disagree with, and hard to see how Abbott will slip out of the shadow of the anodyne if he doesn't start voting with Australia's, and not his interests in mind.  . . read more

blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)