Oil Addiction and Identity
The end of Textbooks
Things which don't go away
Ace Combat: Joint Assault
Sitting Room Teaser
Give Peace a Chance
From The Terraces: Boys Against Men- by Jay Nair
Controversy has filled this past week following French striker Thierry Henry booking France's ticket to the World Cup finals with a handball at the expense of Republic of Ireland. A handball, apparently, seen by everyone except those who mattered.

Luck of the Irish?

More ironic turn of phrase than truth, I'm afraid.

In any case, it sparked a massive debate into the introduction of video replays and post-match punishments for cheating. FIFA president Sepp Blatter is standing fast against video replays, claiming that it would remove the human face of football, and create a disparity between a pickup game in the park and a cup final played in the greatest stadiums of the world.

I hadn't considered the difference between the professional and amateur games until the recent Champions League group game between Barcelona and Inter Milan. At one point, Inter Milan defender Christian Chivu cynically fouled midfielder Andreas Iniesta after the latter moved the ball past him with some clever footwork. Chivu promptly received a yellow card and will now miss the next game, a crucial match against Rubin Kazan of Russia. This single incident brought to mind the fine line between what is outright cheating and "professionalism".

What exactly is professionalism and how is it any different from cheating?

Players often take a few extra steps forward at a throw-in and move the ball a metre ahead for free kicks - all ‘technically' illegal but often ignored and swept under the rug fondly known as "gamesmanship".

Does Henry's handball come under this too?

Football is now a results driven game and no one remembers how well the losers lost, rather they remember who won, if not the manner of the victory.

The proof of this transformation from entertainment for fans to succeeding at all costs is reflected in Henry's handball.

 Who doesn't want to go to the World Cup and have a chance at conquering the world?

Footballers, for all their magic and fancy ball skills are all too human and are subject to the flaws of the human condition.

It is not the hand of God, but the hand of humanity that reaches out in a moment of weakness and uncertainty.

Diving is another issue that demands a solid distinction between cheating and embellishing. It stems from this simple question running through a (hypothetically) honest footballer's mind - "How can I be sure that the referee can see that the other player is fouling me?"

Not all fouls take out a player's legs from beneath him.

Constant shin hacking is illegal but not likely to grab the referee's attention. And that is why we have commentators sagely nodding and conferring amongst one another that so-and-so player is "making more of the challenge". In many ways, it is a legitimate concern of many players, especially the more talented and technical ones who dazzle fans and frustrate opponents.

Danielle de Rossi falling dramatically from a relatively minor tackle might bring on the scorn from the crowd but it may also get the defending player carded which Signor de Rossi feels is deserved because of the constant kicking at his shins.

On the other hand, Jurgen Klinsmann's exuberant crash onto the ground followed by a lateral roll using his head as a fulcrum is nothing more than cheating in its most primitive form. That dive against Italy got an innocent player, who had not even touched Herr Klinsmann, ejected from the match.

Is there an answer to this riddle? Should we all sigh with a dramatic "C'est la vie" and resign ourselves to the fact the game is no longer the romantic spectacle we want it to be?

Cynics would consign us to living in the dreams of young boys playing in the field and tell us to grow up and face the facts like men. But if the result of growing wise to the world is seeing one's cherished game brought down by cheating and the pursuit of pure results without the performance to earn them, I think I'd like to remain a boy playing against men.

Jay Nair, a sport Columnist for homepageDAILY shouts it out, how it is...From the Terraces

Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.
You need to have been a member for 24 hours and validated your email before leaving a comment.
 
From the Terraces: Fashionista Football- by Jay Nair
3 dec  |  From the Terraces: Fashionista Football- by Jay Nair . . read more
From The Terraces: A likely Band of Heroes
23 may  |  From The Terraces: A likely Band of Heroes  . . read more
From the Terraces: It's Us Against The World- by Jay Nair
23 jan  |  From the Terraces: It's Us Against The World- by Jay Nair . . read more
From The Terraces- by Jay Nair
20 nov  |  Hello and welcome to the first of at least a few articles written with a firm focus on football (or soccer, if you prefer). Of course, this series of articles should not and will not refuse to deviate from time to time into exploration of other topics but do expect the majority of them to be based around football. . . read more
English Football's Season of Rumours
12 jun  |  It's the off season in the English Premier League, which means it's also silly season for the rumour mill. This year's star turn is Arsenal striker Thierry Henry. . . read more
Table Talk - From 'The Outsider'
22 jun  |  These are the four round robin groups for the AFC (Asian Football Confederation) Asian Cup which gets under way on July 7 in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia. The groupings look stranger and stranger the longer you look at them.

Of the 16 competing nations only two – Australia and South Korea - are current members of the coalition of the willing (Japan and Thailand withdrew in 2006 and 2004 respectively). Australian sits in the same group as Iraq and the competition includes not only Iran but also Saudi Arabia and China. On human rights, the competing countries include some dismal performers – China, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam – while Australia hovers at the edge of this list though not as a persistent offender.

The question might be – is football a force for good where geopolitical tension and human rights are concerned? Will this competition make war against Iran less likely? Will it improve China’s acceptance of western views on personal freedom? . . read more

From the Terraces: Bigger than the Cup- by Jay Nair
12 dec  |  From the Terraces: Bigger than the Cup- by Jay Nair . . read more
Bowling Woodsy!- by Sumer Dayal
12 apr  |  Bowling Woodsy!- by Sumer Dayal . . read more
Tevez: The Truth is out There
20 jul  |  UK football teams Manchester United and West Ham are locked in an ugly battle of claim and counter claim over Carlos Tevez... but what's the truth behind the situation? . . read more
blogs   100words
 
by Jack Freeman

As four months of travel in India is coming to an end I am finding
it continually confusing that many of the cultural atrocities that
come with this society of 1 billion strong are deemed "interesting"
and "profound".

Sitting in social circles from hostel to hostel, I have met forceful disagreement with my criticisms of the oppressive nature of India's cast system and their large Islamic community. The smug, "oh, you just don't get it" attitude you receive for owning such opinions is both condescending and misguided.

This is an enraging example of the pseudo, naive belief that this "exotic"society is unintelligible to (most of) us westerners. In this beautiful, richly diverse and all round fun country where, by the same token, you will be greeted by zero empathy of female lib, homosexual equality or my own personal faithlessness, I wish that travelers would not deny their education and morals on arrival. Is it not possible to balance both romance and a sense of rationality?