Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Will GM Declare “Environmental Bankruptcy”?- by Nick Aster
One of the nice things about bankruptcy is that certain debts are forgiven and you get something of a clean slate. That may be fine in a strictly financial sense but when environmental externalities are concerned it may be playing fast and loose. General Motors, long criticized for being a laggard on many fronts, agreed some time ago to be a primary participant in a voluntary resource recovery program known as End-of-Life Vehicle Solutions (ELVS).

One of the primary purposes of ELVS is to recover Mercury from automotive switches when vehicles are scrapped. A massive 39,000 pounds of the substance remains to be collected according to activist group Mercury Policy Project.

ELVS Has Not Left the Building, But He's at the Door...

The good news, according to MPP, is that, under pressure, the restructured GM has reaffirmed its commitment to ELVS. The bad news is that it's a temporary participation with no obvious long term commitment.

It also suggests that GM may try to dodge the bullet on other environmental responsibilities under the excuse that the "old GM" no longer exists. GM is such a cornerstone of ELVS that if they drop their involvement, the entire program will likely unravel.

Given that GM is now a partly publicly owned company, I'd argue that they're subject to a particularly high standard of doing the right thing for their owners - both financially and environmentally - and dropping participation in programs like ELVS should be out of the question.

Hunter Lovins, of Natural Capital Solutions says:

As a taxpayer, I'm outraged to have paid to bail this company out, only to have to pay again as it now declares environmental bankruptcy. To allow "Brand GM" to shunt its liability for all of its past environmental pollution to old GM, which will soon liquidate itself, is irresponsible and unfair. Chrysler went bankrupt but is living up to its obligations. Any future GM profits (assuming there ever are any) should go first to pay to clean up all of GM's environmental liabilities, which now far exceed the money left in the fund for all purposes.

Or else you and I and all American taxpayers will get to pay again to clean up polluted vehicle production sites, retrieve mercury switches from GM's old cars lest they get vaporized and wind up in people's lungs, and otherwise support irresponsible corporate practices, which were all part of what drove the company into bankruptcy in the first place.

If we, the new shareholders of new GM, allow the company to remain irresponsible, what hope have we of avoiding its future financial ruin?

Originally published at Triplepundit, click view for more information

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Carbon Price Agreement: The Transformation to Clean Energy
27 feb  |  In recent years, the Greens in Australia have had very little to celebrate about; federally they didn't back the Emissions Trading Scheme they deemed too weak to seriously help the environment - subsequently it failed. However, in the 2010 Australian federal elections they did very well, garnering 12% of the vote, giving them a mandate to push for a strong policy fight against climate change. Here we see Christine Milne announcing what the Greens' tireless fight has brought about and its implications for Australia.  . . read more
CPRS - Why your contributions don't count
29 nov  |  On the day when the 'crucial' CPRS goes to the vote, here are the opinions of an independent organisation that models itself as an empowering tool for consumers. Not surprisingly its focus is very individualistic, but this doesn't take away from the fact that the arguments shown here have been nearly mute from the mainstream debate.  . . read more
6 ways mushrooms will save the world
27 sep  |  Mycologist Paul Stamets studies the mycelium, and lists 6 ways that this astonishing fungus can help save the world.

What do you think of when we say fungi? Portobello, magical or maybe Shitake? Stamets shall teach you a few things! 

There are some other vegetables that can save the world, one which has seen special attention in and around the pacific is coconuts.

What other alternative options and routes should we be examining in order to deal with our environmental problems?  . . read more

The Climate Change Gamble: An Unacceptable Risk?
17 aug  |  John Ralston Saul, President of International PEN, frames the climate change debate as a gamble, calling it an "unacceptable risk" even if the odds are less than 50-50 that human actions are triggering environmental destruction. "You're willing to take this risk, even if it means your grandchildren fry?" Saul asks.  . . read more
Gutless, yes. But the planet's future is no priority of ours
20 dec  |  Despair is not acceptable, but it may be inevitable. Social democrats are the world's optimists, knowing human destiny is in our own hands if we have the will to change. Leave pessimism to the world's conservatives, ever fearful of the future and yearning for a better yesterday. But today optimism feels impossible. The chance of world leaders preventing a more than 2C increase in temperature looks vanishingly small- by Polly Toynbee . . read more
Coral reefs and climate change: A message for Copenhagen
14 dec  |  Coral reefs and climate change: A message for Copenhagen  . . read more
Greening Capitalism: David Blood
8 aug  |  Even amongst those who accept that we’re facing a time of monumental change, one question niggles about the change ahead: what’s it all going to cost? Some say less than the price of a coffee a week, some that reducing emissions will mean considerable costs and a loss of economic competitiveness. How do you make sure good climate strategy equals good business? Does systemic change represent as great an opportunity as it does a challenge? . . read more
Terrifying Visions of the Future
1 nov  |  The United Nations' latest report on the state of the planet reminds us just how badly the environment is faring, and warns that governments are still failing to recognise the seriousness of major environmental issues. Perhaps this confirms that it takes more than statistics to make real the unkind future we risk handing down to our children.  . . read more
Paradigm in Progress PART ONE
24 jun  | 
The past year was not just one of economic turmoil. Across our increasingly hot and crowded planet people are reacting in sundry, yet mostly conventional ways, to the effects of global heating. Here is what global futurist Richard David Hames has to say on the subject.
 . . read more
Prince Charles Shows His Abhorrence Towards Climate Change Skeptics
23 feb  |  Just watch, it's a strange headline and a strange theme for a video but Prince Charles shows himself to be an eloquent defender of climate change action and absolutely scathing toward its sceptics. It's strange to write, but I want to hear more from Charles! . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)