Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
New Anti-Smoking Ads Warn Teens 'It's Gay To Smoke'
Video
Jon Stewart interviews Al Gore on his new book 'Our Choice'
Blog
Two minute silence on Twitter for Remembrance Sunday
Game
Fairytale Fights Gameplay Trailer
Art
Exhibition 2009 at Deeside College
Cool tools
Hot links

Super Mario Flash Game Restyled for Obama

Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
Is date rape funny?

In the latest Seth Rogen comedy Observe and Report, there’s a scene where Rogen’s loser security guard character has sex with a drunken, drugged woman who’s just vomited on herself and passed out and, hey, if that doesn’t get ya chuckling for your $16.50, what will?

In the US, the scene delivered the filmmakers what it was designed to - outrage and publicity - none of which could lift what is an otherwise unmemorable film, nor resuscitate its meagre box office takings ...

Last month Observe and Report sat at number five in the Aussie box office rankings helped no doubt by Rogan’s thousands of local fans, many of whom sit squarely in the demographic dealing with the knee-slapping hilarity of date rape.

It would be foolish to expect a Seth Rogen comedy to adhere to any sort of real-world moral code. Much of his work is contrived to push limits and offend and, while this movie takes a wild swing at bleak social satire, it commits the greatest sin of comedy - it’s not funny.

What’s even less amusing is the real-life rationalisations flowing from Rogen as well as those of several male media commentators.

Rogen, who shot to fame in films like Knocked Up and Superbad, says: “You can literally feel the audience thinking how … are they going to make this okay? Like what can possibly be said or done that I'm not going to walk out of the movie theatre in the next 30 seconds? And then she says, like the one thing that makes it all okay."

What Rogen and the film’s writer and director, Jody Hill, deem okay is for the drugged woman, played by Anna Faris to wake to semi-consciousness during sex and slur, "did I tell you to stop, motherf---er?"

Time magazine film critic Richard Corliss called the scene "the finest thing" in the movie, commenting that it “achieves what few American movies even attempt: to pinpoint the grim compromise, the desperation, that can attend the sex act.”

Dave Itzkoff’s New York Times profile of director Hill says: “In another scene he [Rogen] forces himself on a makeup-counter saleswoman after a date of heavy drinking and drug use. (Before the scene is over she indicates that she had given her consent.)”

The problem with all these responses are they perpetuate the idea that if a woman is so off her face she can barely talk, then this is a good time for sex.

It is not.

In the last few months, we’ve heard a lot about the “grey areas” of sexual consent and like it or not, it’s time men understood that if a woman’s ability to say “yes” to sex is in any way “grey” or confused, then sex is off the agenda.

Instead, we get 66-year-old Time magazine writer Corliss saying of a scene that clearly depicts date rape: “Don't call it love; don't call it grand; but whatever it is, don't stop.”

Dude … you don’t even start.

If a girl is so drunk she can’t keep her eyes open, that’s the end of the night. Taking it any further is called sexual assault and this includes touching, licking, probing and rubbing yourself on her like a mongrel dog while she’s passed out.

If a girl can’t talk, you put her in a cab or you put her in bed and you sleep on the couch. If, when she wakes the next day she’s lost her drunken attraction to you, you have your answer as to whether sexual advances the night before would have been a good idea.

I'm sure there are guys reading this who are thinking "derr, I don't need to be told this by some fruit in suit who writes for Fairfax, I would never never rape anybody."

Well, let's hear from you.

As I was writing this post, I got an email from a reader who sent me a online piece by a woman identified only as Lucy, who has something to say to you if you're "that guy".

She says, "if you're that guy who would never rape a girl passed out on your bed or the woman in the village your battalion is overrunning ..."

"You're the guy who wouldn't do such a thing even when his buddies are heckling him, telling him he's a fag and a pussy if he doesn't. Even more, you're the guy who would stop his frat brother from raping that girl, and get her home. You're the guy who would stop his comrades, or at least report them."

"And to lose the sarcasm for a minute, I'm sure some of you are. Lord knows, I believe that of most of the men I am close to. Or at least, I desperately want to."

"Now, here's my question: where the f--- are you?"

Lucy wants to know why there aren't more stories of 'the guy who got me home when I was seriously drunk and my boyfriend wasn't looking out for me'? Why we don't hear more men speaking up about the times they acted honorably and did the right thing?

Says Lucy: "You probably have stories of a time when your friend was at your apartment drunk and you didn't rape her. And you don't tell them because you don't think that's even a story. And it shouldn't be, but let me tell you: you should start telling them, because those 18-year-old boys who don't think they're bad guys sure aren't listening to us. Maybe they'll listen to you."

"Men raping women is systemic and cultural, and yes it is the patriarchy and it is misogyny and it is men thinking they are entitled to women's bodies. 'Well, what did she expect, getting drunk like that?' isn't salt in the wound, it is the foundation of the problem."

"The idea that if a woman is not actively preventing a man from sticking his penis into her, he is doing nothing wrong, and 'hey, who can blame him', IS THE PROBLEM."

"So I say to men everywhere: if statements like the ones I made above piss you off, try taking it up with the men who make it so. Either be 'that guy', or shut up. If you do nothing else, let us name the problem for what it is."

And this is the problem with the scene in Observe and Report.

It gets in.

Young guys see this stuff in a cinema - and everyone's laughing about it - so how serious can it be?

Seth Rogen is one of the biggest comic stars in the world today and it’s his job description to push the envelope, but I have to think that getting laughs out of date rape falls into the category of early 20th century racist and derogatory humour we now can’t believe was ever found funny.

I discussed this issue with Comedian Wil Anderson last month, whose ABC show The Gruen Transfer copped much criticism over an un-aired fake ad that compared ridiculing fat people to racist jokes.

Anderson’s rule with humour is “that if the person has brought a situation on themselves, they’re fair game” to be mocked for it, which is why he agreed rape is never funny.

No woman ever brings rape on herself: no matter how drunk she is, not matter how flirtatious, no matter how stupid and sadly, there's waaaay too many guys who don't get this.

They view sex as a gem to be prised from its setting, a game to be won, no matter what.

Thankfully there are popular artists showing that you can win fans by addressing this topic with some enlightenment.

The video clip for US rapper Asher Roth's hit single "I Love College" has had more than eight million views on YouTube and contains the lyrics, “Don't leave the house 'til the booze is gone, and don't have sex if she's too gone.”

Sure it’s a mixed message about personal responsibility, but it’s a start.

View the pageGo back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
Years after digital television became normal in Australia, another digital experience is upon us - digital radio. It aims to take the way we listen to the radio to a whole new level. But will it actually take off?

We are now in an age where we have mp3 players allowing us to choose songs at the press of a button. Apple recently posted a quarterly profit of 47% boasting that even in the weak economy, consumers are still buying.

Digital radios have the ability to pause and rewind to their advantage, as well as extra channels. However, I am hesitant as to whether this new listening experience will appeal to listeners. When driving in the car, I feel the listening experience is maximised when listening to an iPod allowing the consumer to choose exactly when they want to listen to their song or podcast.

Hundreds of podcasts are flooding the internet and a lack of radio programs available by podcast is hardly a concern. On the flip side, dedicated news and sports channels can be provided and thus appeal to niche markets. This development would have been well used and suited to consumers lifestyles a decade ago, when iPods were starting to enter the market.

This new development in radio is ahead of countries like Germany, Italy and China. I guess we’ll have to wait to see if Australians adapt to this new form of radio and digital media.

Find out about our Widget

Feedback

7 jul

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

*********************************

Re: The Pointless Question of "What is Art?"

You're article serves as a blatant example of people's lack of knowledge/interest in the contemporary art scene. Some of the most profound and revealing conversations stem from dicussions of art, politics and religion so why label them taboo subject matter? why not let the idiots add in their artistic two cents, because who knows what could happen? a change of opinion... an education... a flash of interest? Perhaps you and your friends to venture down to the COFA 09 annual exhibit and see some 200 fresh sydney artists emerge onto the art scene, unless it's too boring/inane. - Kara

*********************************

Re: The Pointless Question of "What is Art?"

I dare say the question is not pointless but rather is made pointless by overcomplications of academia and peripherals of market and status, in which Sean appears to have gotten bogged down notwithstanding the word limit. One of the things we do know about art for a fact is that we humans appear to have always had it around from the caves (who can forget the fetching bison from Alta Mira!) So the issue is cutting through the baggage of history as old as humanity to get back to the fundamentals. It took me about 35 years of research but does not take 100 words. It is this: "Art is something that is designed to communicate thoughts and feelings and to influence our thoughts and feeling through one or more of our senses."(25 words) Since we have space, a rider: "The particular art form is qualified by the particular senses involved in production and reception of that communication. If Sound then Music, If body then Dance. If we use eyes to perceive colour and shape we call it Visual art." How you work the item in question is the matter of objectivity after all some of us eat fruit raw and others make jam. If you choose to make art an investment go for it, if you choose to make it a status symbol you won't be the first. However, in my book, art is really the best at being art and in the immortal words of one Oscar Wilde, for any other purpose "All art is quite useless" - Valerie (Co-incidental author of "Why Art? The Pocket Art Expert)
*********************************

Re: John Safran ready for when skit hits the fan

The only aspect of "multiculturalism" we (or any western society)have accepted, revolves around food: sweet and sour chicken or donner kebab..nothing else is relevent, interesting or in anyway beneficial to us. The Cronulla riots were seen as well overdue by most people abroad, we should be proud of standing up to and rejecting ethnic gangs from our pure shores - "Peter Piper"

*********************************

Re: Brassed off about creationism- by Andy Coghlan

This is why we need change in Texas and why I'm running for State Board of Education. - Rebecca Bell-Metereau (www.voterebecca.com)

*********************************

Re: The Rape Tunnel

It astonishes and intrigues me this 'shock art' Being a over zealous muscled ex con looking for love, where could one find Richard Whitehursts hole?

*********************************

Re: ETS Voted Down: Rudd Proves Himself An Evil Genius

Nice to see such an insightful article, despite the snide comments.. Did you read the Quarterly Essay by Guy Pearse in writing the first 5 paragraphs- not that that's a bad thing really. Nice of you to widen your vision beyond the road ahead and take in some history- but I would add one thing- that as it stands (in the senate, especially with Steve Fielding) we won't have a real, meaningful ETS passed. The bummer is that even with a double dissolution election and the resultant simultaneous sitting of both houses of parliament (which as you point out, the greens/minor parties and labor would benefit from) would still not change the ETS from it's current configuration- not unless the Greens tripled their vote. Silly that it all came down to labor preferences to a little known party led by a little know bloke named Steve Fielding and Family First- not that that should be the reason we're in this predicament... - Shaun Lambert

*********************************

Re: Evil Capitalists

In response to the "100 Words" on Psychotic Capitalism: The statement, "only psychotics fail to distinguish right from wrong," has a semantic problem. What makes a person psychotic is the inability to recognize that, theoretically, actions or behavior can be right and wrong. A psychologically normal person can do this by age 5. But well- intentioned people constantly disagree about which actions are right and wrong in particular situations. This evening my husband and I re- watched "Zeitgeist--- Addendum" on youtube. We had to restrain ourselves from a festival of paranoia, anger and frustration at what appears to be an evil plot to enslave us all, to bleed us like pods in The Matrix. I cannot argue against the idea that Capitalism--- looked at as a planetary movement--- seems heartlessly destructive, yet there is no single person or even group of Illuminati to blame --- we are willing participants in this plot to rule the world, exploit the human race, rape Mother Earth. All of us are not psychotic, rather we are doing what seems right, and we are following norms set by our culture and community. I personally do my best to support those lawmakers who help us define right at wrong at the transpersonal level--- where this kind of crime being committed, with vast and ultimately very personal consequences. Indeed people can be stupider and meaner in groups than singly --- but whatever the right word is for that, it is not psychotic. Our real problem is that we seem incapable of seeing consequences beyond the local and immediate, we are selfish and shortsighted. But the writer is right: stupid, mean, selfish, shortsighted --- these terms trivialize the unfathomable crimes of Capitalists and their sheep-like dupes. - Anna Willis

*********************************

Re: Ethics Implicit?

There is one place where ethics is not "implicit everywhere" and that is television and the media generally - the only ethic is win the audience. This is the toxic environment "informing" students. - Terry McGee

*********************************

Re: Australia's Swine Flu vaccination plan

The word "pandemic" has absolutely nothing to do with a deadly disease taking over the planet. The definition of "Pandemic" is simply about the SPREAD of a disease. Any disease. It could be a relatively harmless disease like the Swine Flu, to maybe a more harmful type (like normal seasonal influenza). Nothing to do with how bad or how good it is to your health ... just how WIDESPREAD it is. That is the interpretation of "Pandemic". A word that is nothing to be scared about, but just a measure of the SPREAD of any disease (harmful or relatively harmless) around the globe. The original "Spanish Flu" in 1819 killed 50 to 100 million people worldwide. Swine Flu deaths to date? 2,800 or so. Compare this to up to 500,000 deaths worldwide from our ongoing "Seasonal Flu". People need to see things in perspective. Swine Flu is a mild flu. No need for risky & possibly dangerous vaccinations. No need to be scared. In fact NO NEED TO DO ANYTHING. Just stay cool and take whatever vitamins & health supplements that are appropriate. Good luck & stay informed. - Tim
 
*********************************

Re: Kabul-shit

A nice puncture of the ADF's mad illusions. Shooting civvies in another land used to be called murder, now we pretend its nation building. It must have struck a chord. General Jim Molan, the butcher of Fallujah, who used white phosphorous & put snipers on hospital rooftops, raves in today's SMH about staying true to the mission. What is it with these guys? Untold deaths in Iraq, bombs still exploding, millions of refugees ... and this guy thinks he's a genius. - Tina G

*********************************

Re: Why we shouldn't care about he loneliness of the University Liberal

While you have managed to approach, with a complete lack of understanding and sensitivity, the complaints of the many people who feel alienated by the overtly leftist university agenda, I also think that you have failed to address the concerns of an increasingly disenfranchised leftist populace. The article was concerning the Left Handed bigots, not the personal politics of either of the 4 people mentioned. Their concern was not with, as you pointlessly attacked, their political beliefs, but rather with their freedom to express their beliefs and how they were treated on campus because of them. I write this as a disenfranchised leftist. Apparently, freedom of speech on campus somehow took a backseat to the far left's bigotry, however well intentioned they thought it was originally. I'm not right; I'm not left. But fuck anybody that tries to censure me and revoke my right to freedom of speech, merely for believing in a political party. Anyone that thinks that's OK, well simply look up the definition of fascist. - I Swing My Vote

*********************************

Re: Why we shouldn't care about he loneliness of the University Liberal

Sean Maguire makes some useful points in rebutting Paul Sheehan's puff piece about nasty lefties on campus. But he does Socialist Alternative a disservice by suggesting the Liberals stereotype us in the same we stereotype them. We don't stereotype Liberals; we understand the role they play (like Labor) in continuing the exploitative system that is capitalism. The suggestion in Sheehan's article that we would direct anti-semitic language at Liberals is a lie. We are opposed to Zionism, the apartheid philosophy which justifies on-going genocide against Palestinians. We are opposed to racism. We think that the political liberation of both Jews and Palestinians lies in a one state solution - a rainbow nation for all who want to live in a democratic and secular Palestine. To tar those who oppose Zionism with the brush of anti-semitism is cheap trick designed to avoid debate about the reality of Zionism and in this case to smear with a gross lie the Liberals' political opponents on campus like Socialist Alternative. Some leftists may have mistakenly called Liberals fascists. If so this is to misunderstand the class enemy. Liberals are not fascists; they are anti-working class warmongers. It is important to keep that distinction and truth in mind. - John Passant

*********************************

Re: 360 Degrees

In response to Al's earlier comment. Valid as your opinion is, it offers no alternatives nor progressive thought, which is exactly what has created the issue Jack brought up. Try creating a system different to the one that is now, and see if you can solve issues rather then identify, and then ingnore/accept them? - Khedra

*********************************

Re: CIA Cry Babies

The good news about the pro torture stance of The Wall Street Journal and The Australian is that it reminds the public of Murdoch's indifference to international law, his manipulation of idiots (Fox News) and his relentless sadism. The wars he promotes have killed over a million people - any regrets? Nah. Rupert puts the full resources of his media at the disposal of Dick Cheney & daughter to promote the glories of waterboarding. What next? A Wall Street Journal scoop: "why the Spanish inquisition saved civilisation." - Alistair

*********************************

Re: West is Best

It is true democracy is more benign than rule by Sheiks, mullahs and dictator's, but to boast the west is best in an age of perpetual war and planetary eco-rape is weird. Franklin D. Roosevelt is long gone and the Declaration of Human rights championed by Eleanor Roosevelt is ignored by post 9/11 USA. Today, American politicians and commentators LOVE cruel & unusual punishments, invasions, occupations, covert killings , exporting arms, etc etc. Sean believes colonialism is history. He needs to travel more. - Suzette

*********************************

360 Degrees of Bullshit

Well said Jack Freeman, but trying to cut out the middlemen is like draining the Ganges with a sieve.Doomed. Plus capitalism can't function without the drones fleecing the creatives and then going shopping. It's how the system works. - Al Kaufman

*********************************

Yesterday's page was hot - Pilger, Neville and yippie publishing ikon Paul Krassner, also a comedian. (He featured at the Sydney writers fest a few year ago). And I like the new writers you're bringing and the hints of feminist consciousness. Keep it up. - Gerrie

*********************************

'Living in denial' The Australian Fim Industry was absolutley the best bit of journalism Ive read in a long time. Robert was spot on in every point of his discussion. IT laso should be noted it also affects our talent pool as well, as they end up heading overseas to find work and make a living in better evolved film enviroments. Hopefully one day the Film Industry, governments (and acting/film schoolsas well) will realise this epidemic and inject some much needed life and diversity in the industry to make us, 'the audience' want to go to an australlian movie.

*********************************

12 sep
10 aug
More feedback...
© 2007-2008 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us