Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
New Anti-Smoking Ads Warn Teens 'It's Gay To Smoke'
Video
Jon Stewart interviews Al Gore on his new book 'Our Choice'
Blog
Two minute silence on Twitter for Remembrance Sunday
Game
Fairytale Fights Gameplay Trailer
Art
Exhibition 2009 at Deeside College
Cool tools
Hot links

Super Mario Flash Game Restyled for Obama

Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
The Courthouse: Where justice and equality reigns supreme

Here is a story of horrible and insidious racism. I’d like to say it took place seventy years ago in some back-water in Southern America, but it happened this Friday night, in the very heart of multicultural Sydney. By Sean Maguire

In Taylor Square on Oxford St, I sat with a friend. That friend was homepagedaily resident cartoonist Jack Freeman. It was after 2am, which (generally) means there’s a lock-out. The lock-out forces you to stay off the streets, and to keep drinking in whatever venue you were in 2am. But, for some reason some pubs and clubs are able to bypass it. One of which, is the Courthouse, which sits on the corner of Oxford St and Bourke St.

It’s a charming little venue; renowned for being one of the few places in the area open after hours. In these after hours most of the clientele are completely pissed; with the glasses a soft plastic so we don’t smash glass onto each other’s faces.  

Sitting outside, Jack and I saw an Aboriginal man and woman walk away from the entrance to the bar, angry. Very angry. What can I say about them? I can’t talk with too much empirical evidence. Anecdotally though, they didn’t seem drunk. They were certainly speaking clearly, more than could be said for the 99% of people drinking at the bar. They were also dressed presentably, which has always been a favourite excuse for bouncers to refuse entry.  

I talked to the woman, called Nadia, and then to her husband (who never told me his name). Nadia was lovely. A mother and someone who just wanted to go have a drink with her husband. I asked why they’d been refused entry when every other pissed up night-crawler was strolling, or rather, staggering in. She said it was because they were Aboriginal. Full stop, end of story.  

A pretty flabbergasting statement to a sheltered-white-middle-class-northern-beaches-boy. Surely not? Surely forty years after Aborigines had got citizenship and become people (rather than fauna), surely things were different. Hadn’t we said sorry and hadn’t things changed?  

Nope. I sat with her, and listened as she explained that she and her husband couldn’t get in. There was this incredibly dead, seen it all before look in Nadia’s eyes, her husband still had enough energy to be bothered to fight, but he too looked to be losing patience. I stood up (and in my eternal arrogance) said I’d like to talk to the bouncer. She looked at me, her eyes watery, seconds before she burst into tears. “Don’t bother” she said. She’d seen it all before, I hugged her tightly as she cried, and then said “No, we can fight this”, I stood up and marched to the bouncer. She must have been mistaken, I thought. And even if she wasn’t, me, a young, well-educated white man would convince this bouncer otherwise.  

As I stood up, her husband looked at me, and started telling me that these ‘coconuts (people from the Pacific Islands) were always fucking him’. He then regurgitated a lot of ridiculous slander that seems to have joined the unofficial lexicon and thoughts of all pig-ignorant Australians. It’s all about the FOBS (people Fresh Off Boats), and how people from the Pacific Islands are coming here, getting violent, taking our jobs, and then treating us, the hard-working Australian, like shit.  

I’d heard it all before, I didn’t agree with it, and I definitely didn’t feel comfortable hearing it in this situation. I swallowed my reservations and thought I should keep going. Racism doesn’t justify racism, one terrible act doesn’t excuse another. This guy’s hatred toward Islanders would probably take longer to solve than getting these guys into the Courthouse. Or so I thought.  

When I got there, the bouncer gave me absolutely no explanation. And why should he? With the Courthouse a private premise he didn’t need to. There are those signs everywhere, in every pub; they all pretty much read: ‘this venue has the right to refuse entry to anybody’. It’s up to the discretion of the staff to decide who can enter, which, to the non-racist staff-member and in most circumstances makes sense. If someone is being abusive, I can understand that they shouldn’t enter, if someone is pissed, all the better they’re not there, but when it seems a way to remove a person, judged solely on their race. Well, we can’t let them hide behind the sign, can we?  

I kept asking the bouncer. “They’re not pissed, they’re dressed well, it’s because they’re Aboriginal, isn’t it?” But he ignored me. With all the people walking in next to me, he didn’t have much time to chat. I asked him again if it was racially motivated, he didn’t say anything, I said I’d call the police, he finally paid attention, he looked at me and challenged me to call them. I paused for thought as I walked back to Jack, Nadia and her husband. Should I call the police? Was there any point?  

I thought I’d best try, maybe they could explain what was going on, I called the emergency number, told them where I was, and what was happening. The operator was quick, and to the point, and said she’d dispatch officers immediately. I stood and waited, when lo and behold four police officers rounded the corner. Three males and one female officer. I walked to the male officer nearest to me and explained the situation, he was calm and collected. He explained that he couldn’t do anything; I’d have to write to the Anti-Discrimination board. I wasn’t angry by the response, but I followed him a couple more metres to make sure I’d heard correctly. Was there literally nothing that could be done?  

As I walked toward him, the lone female police officer, (who looked in her mid twenties, and quite aggressive) stepped forward and started accusing me that I was following her. The fact I was still in a conversation with her colleague was ignored, I tried to argue this, but every time I opened my mouth, she screamed louder, this was a “warning, leave, walk away and we won’t fine you”. She hadn’t told me what I was going to be fined with, but I didn’t want to test her. I quickly complied, and walked over to my friends who were sitting, not too far away from the gaggle of police officers.

By this stage, Nadia was really crying, and Jack was hugging and comforting her. Her husband though, was up on his feet; he walked back to the police officers, and stated his case, (with reference again to the coconuts). The police didn’t seem particularly interested and were doing that policemen thing where they look far over your shoulder as you speak.  

He was yelling, not aggressively, but it was still scaring his wife, who cried harder into Jack’s arms. I think she was scared of him getting arrested, or fined. Standing there, seeing her cry and seeing his anger, I thought I’d try and get him out of there. I walked up to the police, the husband with his back to me, me saying as I was walking: ‘come back mate’, and other things to this affect.  

The female police officer who I’d ran into before, saw me pulling the husband back, and exploded.  She ran toward me, reminding me of the caution she’d given me. I tried to explain. I wanted to make sure this man didn’t get in trouble, but she as our most public bastion of fairness, order and law, didn’t listen. She kept yelling, as one of her male colleagues shook his head, and put his index finger to his mouth, to signal to me to be quiet.  

“Do you want to spend the night in Surry Hill’s police station?” I kept trying to interrupt, but to no avail, she asked for my ID, which I said I didn’t have. She rummaged in my pockets, found the ID and ordered me to sit down. Any semblance of desire to resist was gone; I sat in silence as she wrote me a ticket. Why? She gave some garbled answer that I was a public nuisance, she asked if I lived at the address on my ID and said that “I’d be sorry” if she sent the fine and “I wasn’t there’.  

She finished writing, and then ordered me up and away; I got up and walked down Oxford St, waiting for Jack to catch up. She stood, in Taylor Square fifty metres away, yelling at me to keep moving, I obliged and met up with Jack not far further on. As I walked away I realised that she hadn’t mentioned a dollar figure for the fine, or when I should expect to receive it. So I’m guessing she probably just wanted me to leave and that I’m probably in the clear.  

Although, saying that, I wouldn’t pay the fine if I received it. It sounds ridiculous to say, but I truly think that my actions were justified and were done to protect someone’s civil rights. I challenge anyone to give me any another motive for what happened, I challenge anyone to say the female police officer’s reaction wasn’t overkill, and that the actions of the bouncers weren’t based on assumptions of race.  

I, although drunk, was lucid, and I was definitely lucid enough to make myself understood to the bouncers and the police. I spoke calmly and collectedly, but was met with either stony indifference, or over-the-top anger that was surely meant to distract. Both seemed like well tested and well tried techniques to get rid of people.

The bouncer was enormous and scary, and had absolutely no reason to debate with me. The anger of the policewoman was scary. This was someone who had a gun, a baton, and some eye-watering sprays. I wasn’t going to challenge her, or her authority. All her anger did, was frighten me, I didn’t respect her for it. I respected her colleagues because they spoke to me rationally and calmly, I had no reason to fear them, and seeing me, they must have judged me as I was, a calm, scrawny little boy, asking a few harmless questions.  

I keep asking myself those questions. What was that all about? All I can answer was that this was racism pure and simple. This was the worst type of racism, the one that makes the skin crawl, and the hair stand up. It was a venue, twisting laws for refusing entry to discriminate against a whole race; it was an ineffectual police service, and an obviously ineffectual Anti-Discrimination board. It was something horribly endemic, just as the ‘coconuts’ comment was from the husband. It was something that a people face daily, but is peripheral enough to be ignored. It wasn’t as obvious as a sign above a bar saying ‘whites only’, it was just two people being treated like shit. Because they were Aboriginal.  
 

* If you have any idea of what to do next, please write in. Is there any point in complaining about the female police officer? Is there any point in writing to the Anti-Discrimination Board? Should we boycott the Courthouse and keep an eye out for bars that do similar things? 

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
Years after digital television became normal in Australia, another digital experience is upon us - digital radio. It aims to take the way we listen to the radio to a whole new level. But will it actually take off?

We are now in an age where we have mp3 players allowing us to choose songs at the press of a button. Apple recently posted a quarterly profit of 47% boasting that even in the weak economy, consumers are still buying.

Digital radios have the ability to pause and rewind to their advantage, as well as extra channels. However, I am hesitant as to whether this new listening experience will appeal to listeners. When driving in the car, I feel the listening experience is maximised when listening to an iPod allowing the consumer to choose exactly when they want to listen to their song or podcast.

Hundreds of podcasts are flooding the internet and a lack of radio programs available by podcast is hardly a concern. On the flip side, dedicated news and sports channels can be provided and thus appeal to niche markets. This development would have been well used and suited to consumers lifestyles a decade ago, when iPods were starting to enter the market.

This new development in radio is ahead of countries like Germany, Italy and China. I guess we’ll have to wait to see if Australians adapt to this new form of radio and digital media.

Find out about our Widget

Feedback

7 jul

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

*********************************

Re: The Pointless Question of "What is Art?"

You're article serves as a blatant example of people's lack of knowledge/interest in the contemporary art scene. Some of the most profound and revealing conversations stem from dicussions of art, politics and religion so why label them taboo subject matter? why not let the idiots add in their artistic two cents, because who knows what could happen? a change of opinion... an education... a flash of interest? Perhaps you and your friends to venture down to the COFA 09 annual exhibit and see some 200 fresh sydney artists emerge onto the art scene, unless it's too boring/inane. - Kara

*********************************

Re: The Pointless Question of "What is Art?"

I dare say the question is not pointless but rather is made pointless by overcomplications of academia and peripherals of market and status, in which Sean appears to have gotten bogged down notwithstanding the word limit. One of the things we do know about art for a fact is that we humans appear to have always had it around from the caves (who can forget the fetching bison from Alta Mira!) So the issue is cutting through the baggage of history as old as humanity to get back to the fundamentals. It took me about 35 years of research but does not take 100 words. It is this: "Art is something that is designed to communicate thoughts and feelings and to influence our thoughts and feeling through one or more of our senses."(25 words) Since we have space, a rider: "The particular art form is qualified by the particular senses involved in production and reception of that communication. If Sound then Music, If body then Dance. If we use eyes to perceive colour and shape we call it Visual art." How you work the item in question is the matter of objectivity after all some of us eat fruit raw and others make jam. If you choose to make art an investment go for it, if you choose to make it a status symbol you won't be the first. However, in my book, art is really the best at being art and in the immortal words of one Oscar Wilde, for any other purpose "All art is quite useless" - Valerie (Co-incidental author of "Why Art? The Pocket Art Expert)
*********************************

Re: John Safran ready for when skit hits the fan

The only aspect of "multiculturalism" we (or any western society)have accepted, revolves around food: sweet and sour chicken or donner kebab..nothing else is relevent, interesting or in anyway beneficial to us. The Cronulla riots were seen as well overdue by most people abroad, we should be proud of standing up to and rejecting ethnic gangs from our pure shores - "Peter Piper"

*********************************

Re: Brassed off about creationism- by Andy Coghlan

This is why we need change in Texas and why I'm running for State Board of Education. - Rebecca Bell-Metereau (www.voterebecca.com)

*********************************

Re: The Rape Tunnel

It astonishes and intrigues me this 'shock art' Being a over zealous muscled ex con looking for love, where could one find Richard Whitehursts hole?

*********************************

Re: ETS Voted Down: Rudd Proves Himself An Evil Genius

Nice to see such an insightful article, despite the snide comments.. Did you read the Quarterly Essay by Guy Pearse in writing the first 5 paragraphs- not that that's a bad thing really. Nice of you to widen your vision beyond the road ahead and take in some history- but I would add one thing- that as it stands (in the senate, especially with Steve Fielding) we won't have a real, meaningful ETS passed. The bummer is that even with a double dissolution election and the resultant simultaneous sitting of both houses of parliament (which as you point out, the greens/minor parties and labor would benefit from) would still not change the ETS from it's current configuration- not unless the Greens tripled their vote. Silly that it all came down to labor preferences to a little known party led by a little know bloke named Steve Fielding and Family First- not that that should be the reason we're in this predicament... - Shaun Lambert

*********************************

Re: Evil Capitalists

In response to the "100 Words" on Psychotic Capitalism: The statement, "only psychotics fail to distinguish right from wrong," has a semantic problem. What makes a person psychotic is the inability to recognize that, theoretically, actions or behavior can be right and wrong. A psychologically normal person can do this by age 5. But well- intentioned people constantly disagree about which actions are right and wrong in particular situations. This evening my husband and I re- watched "Zeitgeist--- Addendum" on youtube. We had to restrain ourselves from a festival of paranoia, anger and frustration at what appears to be an evil plot to enslave us all, to bleed us like pods in The Matrix. I cannot argue against the idea that Capitalism--- looked at as a planetary movement--- seems heartlessly destructive, yet there is no single person or even group of Illuminati to blame --- we are willing participants in this plot to rule the world, exploit the human race, rape Mother Earth. All of us are not psychotic, rather we are doing what seems right, and we are following norms set by our culture and community. I personally do my best to support those lawmakers who help us define right at wrong at the transpersonal level--- where this kind of crime being committed, with vast and ultimately very personal consequences. Indeed people can be stupider and meaner in groups than singly --- but whatever the right word is for that, it is not psychotic. Our real problem is that we seem incapable of seeing consequences beyond the local and immediate, we are selfish and shortsighted. But the writer is right: stupid, mean, selfish, shortsighted --- these terms trivialize the unfathomable crimes of Capitalists and their sheep-like dupes. - Anna Willis

*********************************

Re: Ethics Implicit?

There is one place where ethics is not "implicit everywhere" and that is television and the media generally - the only ethic is win the audience. This is the toxic environment "informing" students. - Terry McGee

*********************************

Re: Australia's Swine Flu vaccination plan

The word "pandemic" has absolutely nothing to do with a deadly disease taking over the planet. The definition of "Pandemic" is simply about the SPREAD of a disease. Any disease. It could be a relatively harmless disease like the Swine Flu, to maybe a more harmful type (like normal seasonal influenza). Nothing to do with how bad or how good it is to your health ... just how WIDESPREAD it is. That is the interpretation of "Pandemic". A word that is nothing to be scared about, but just a measure of the SPREAD of any disease (harmful or relatively harmless) around the globe. The original "Spanish Flu" in 1819 killed 50 to 100 million people worldwide. Swine Flu deaths to date? 2,800 or so. Compare this to up to 500,000 deaths worldwide from our ongoing "Seasonal Flu". People need to see things in perspective. Swine Flu is a mild flu. No need for risky & possibly dangerous vaccinations. No need to be scared. In fact NO NEED TO DO ANYTHING. Just stay cool and take whatever vitamins & health supplements that are appropriate. Good luck & stay informed. - Tim
 
*********************************

Re: Kabul-shit

A nice puncture of the ADF's mad illusions. Shooting civvies in another land used to be called murder, now we pretend its nation building. It must have struck a chord. General Jim Molan, the butcher of Fallujah, who used white phosphorous & put snipers on hospital rooftops, raves in today's SMH about staying true to the mission. What is it with these guys? Untold deaths in Iraq, bombs still exploding, millions of refugees ... and this guy thinks he's a genius. - Tina G

*********************************

Re: Why we shouldn't care about he loneliness of the University Liberal

While you have managed to approach, with a complete lack of understanding and sensitivity, the complaints of the many people who feel alienated by the overtly leftist university agenda, I also think that you have failed to address the concerns of an increasingly disenfranchised leftist populace. The article was concerning the Left Handed bigots, not the personal politics of either of the 4 people mentioned. Their concern was not with, as you pointlessly attacked, their political beliefs, but rather with their freedom to express their beliefs and how they were treated on campus because of them. I write this as a disenfranchised leftist. Apparently, freedom of speech on campus somehow took a backseat to the far left's bigotry, however well intentioned they thought it was originally. I'm not right; I'm not left. But fuck anybody that tries to censure me and revoke my right to freedom of speech, merely for believing in a political party. Anyone that thinks that's OK, well simply look up the definition of fascist. - I Swing My Vote

*********************************

Re: Why we shouldn't care about he loneliness of the University Liberal

Sean Maguire makes some useful points in rebutting Paul Sheehan's puff piece about nasty lefties on campus. But he does Socialist Alternative a disservice by suggesting the Liberals stereotype us in the same we stereotype them. We don't stereotype Liberals; we understand the role they play (like Labor) in continuing the exploitative system that is capitalism. The suggestion in Sheehan's article that we would direct anti-semitic language at Liberals is a lie. We are opposed to Zionism, the apartheid philosophy which justifies on-going genocide against Palestinians. We are opposed to racism. We think that the political liberation of both Jews and Palestinians lies in a one state solution - a rainbow nation for all who want to live in a democratic and secular Palestine. To tar those who oppose Zionism with the brush of anti-semitism is cheap trick designed to avoid debate about the reality of Zionism and in this case to smear with a gross lie the Liberals' political opponents on campus like Socialist Alternative. Some leftists may have mistakenly called Liberals fascists. If so this is to misunderstand the class enemy. Liberals are not fascists; they are anti-working class warmongers. It is important to keep that distinction and truth in mind. - John Passant

*********************************

Re: 360 Degrees

In response to Al's earlier comment. Valid as your opinion is, it offers no alternatives nor progressive thought, which is exactly what has created the issue Jack brought up. Try creating a system different to the one that is now, and see if you can solve issues rather then identify, and then ingnore/accept them? - Khedra

*********************************

Re: CIA Cry Babies

The good news about the pro torture stance of The Wall Street Journal and The Australian is that it reminds the public of Murdoch's indifference to international law, his manipulation of idiots (Fox News) and his relentless sadism. The wars he promotes have killed over a million people - any regrets? Nah. Rupert puts the full resources of his media at the disposal of Dick Cheney & daughter to promote the glories of waterboarding. What next? A Wall Street Journal scoop: "why the Spanish inquisition saved civilisation." - Alistair

*********************************

Re: West is Best

It is true democracy is more benign than rule by Sheiks, mullahs and dictator's, but to boast the west is best in an age of perpetual war and planetary eco-rape is weird. Franklin D. Roosevelt is long gone and the Declaration of Human rights championed by Eleanor Roosevelt is ignored by post 9/11 USA. Today, American politicians and commentators LOVE cruel & unusual punishments, invasions, occupations, covert killings , exporting arms, etc etc. Sean believes colonialism is history. He needs to travel more. - Suzette

*********************************

360 Degrees of Bullshit

Well said Jack Freeman, but trying to cut out the middlemen is like draining the Ganges with a sieve.Doomed. Plus capitalism can't function without the drones fleecing the creatives and then going shopping. It's how the system works. - Al Kaufman

*********************************

Yesterday's page was hot - Pilger, Neville and yippie publishing ikon Paul Krassner, also a comedian. (He featured at the Sydney writers fest a few year ago). And I like the new writers you're bringing and the hints of feminist consciousness. Keep it up. - Gerrie

*********************************

'Living in denial' The Australian Fim Industry was absolutley the best bit of journalism Ive read in a long time. Robert was spot on in every point of his discussion. IT laso should be noted it also affects our talent pool as well, as they end up heading overseas to find work and make a living in better evolved film enviroments. Hopefully one day the Film Industry, governments (and acting/film schoolsas well) will realise this epidemic and inject some much needed life and diversity in the industry to make us, 'the audience' want to go to an australlian movie.

*********************************

12 sep
10 aug
More feedback...
© 2007-2008 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us