Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Halt all carbon emissions by 2050: Worldwatch

To avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change, world carbon emissions will have to drop to near zero by 2050 and "go negative" after that, the Worldwatch Institute reported on Tuesday.


This is a deeper cut than called for by most climate experts and policymakers, including President-elect Barack Obama, who favors an 80 percent drop in U.S. carbon emissions by mid-century.

Limiting carbon emissions aims to keep global mean temperature from rising more than 3.6 degrees F (2 degrees C) over what it was before the Industrial Revolution -- but one Worldwatch author said even this is too dangerous.

2191345560102347975S600x600Q85

"Global warming needs to be reduced from peak levels to 1 degree (Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) as fast as possible," co-author William Hare said at a briefing on the "State of the World 2009" report. "At this level you can see some of the risks fade into the background."

Global mean temperature has already risen 1.4 degrees F (0.8 C) since 1850, so drastic cuts in emissions of climate-warming carbon dioxide are needed, according to Hare, now working at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.

Hare said that global greenhouse gas emissions would need to hit their peak by 2020 and drop 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, and keep dropping after that. He said carbon dioxide emissions would have to "go negative," with more being absorbed than emitted, in the second half of this century.

The burden of cutting greenhouse emissions should fall more heavily on rich countries than poor ones, Hare said, with industrialized nations reducing emissions by 90 percent by 2050, allowing developing nations to let their economies grow and develop new technologies that will ultimately reduce climate-warming gases.

2009: A PIVOTAL YEAR?

Even with these dramatic changes, the world may face an additional rise of nearly 1.8 degrees F (1 degree C) because the impact of past greenhouse emissions hasn't yet been felt on surface temperatures, the report said.

This year could be pivotal in the movement against climate change, said co-author Robert Engelman, with "scientists more certain and concerned, the public more engaged than ever before, an incoming U.S. president bringing to the White House for the first time a solid commitment to cap and then shrink this country's massive injections of greenhouse gases ... into the atmosphere."

carbon emissions2

Engelman also noted this year's deadline for a global agreement to craft a successor pact to the carbon-capping Kyoto Protocol. This is set to happen in December at a meeting in Copenhagen.

Engelman said the Copenhagen meeting could put in place a new "financial architecture" that discourages greenhouse emissions and rewards actions that take these emissions out of the atmosphere.

This could take the form of a cap-and-trade system or a carbon tax, he said, and could also include "the best terms of trade, investment and credit" for countries that make the transition to a low-carbon economy.

emission-freejpg_5638

"However this turns out, we still have some precious time and a clear shot at safely managing human-induced climate change," Engelman said. "What's at stake is not just nature as we've always known it, but quite possibly the survival of our civilization. It's going to be a really interesting year."

Commenting on the report, environmental chemist Stephen Lincoln of the University of Adelaide in Australia said in a statement: "The strongest message from State of the World 2009 is this: if the world does not take action early and in adequate measure, the impacts of climate change could prove extremely harmful and overwhelm our capacity to adapt." 

The Washington-based Worldwatch Institute is an independent research organization.

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Carbon Price Agreement: The Transformation to Clean Energy
27 feb  |  In recent years, the Greens in Australia have had very little to celebrate about; federally they didn't back the Emissions Trading Scheme they deemed too weak to seriously help the environment - subsequently it failed. However, in the 2010 Australian federal elections they did very well, garnering 12% of the vote, giving them a mandate to push for a strong policy fight against climate change. Here we see Christine Milne announcing what the Greens' tireless fight has brought about and its implications for Australia.  . . read more
CPRS - Why your contributions don't count
29 nov  |  On the day when the 'crucial' CPRS goes to the vote, here are the opinions of an independent organisation that models itself as an empowering tool for consumers. Not surprisingly its focus is very individualistic, but this doesn't take away from the fact that the arguments shown here have been nearly mute from the mainstream debate.  . . read more
6 ways mushrooms will save the world
27 sep  |  Mycologist Paul Stamets studies the mycelium, and lists 6 ways that this astonishing fungus can help save the world.

What do you think of when we say fungi? Portobello, magical or maybe Shitake? Stamets shall teach you a few things! 

There are some other vegetables that can save the world, one which has seen special attention in and around the pacific is coconuts.

What other alternative options and routes should we be examining in order to deal with our environmental problems?  . . read more

The Climate Change Gamble: An Unacceptable Risk?
17 aug  |  John Ralston Saul, President of International PEN, frames the climate change debate as a gamble, calling it an "unacceptable risk" even if the odds are less than 50-50 that human actions are triggering environmental destruction. "You're willing to take this risk, even if it means your grandchildren fry?" Saul asks.  . . read more
Will GM Declare “Environmental Bankruptcy”?- by Nick Aster
15 nov  |  One of the nice things about bankruptcy is that certain debts are forgiven and you get something of a clean slate. That may be fine in a strictly financial sense but when environmental externalities are concerned it may be playing fast and loose. General Motors, long criticized for being a laggard on many fronts, agreed some time ago to be a primary participant in a voluntary resource recovery program known as End-of-Life Vehicle Solutions (ELVS).  . . read more
Gutless, yes. But the planet's future is no priority of ours
20 dec  |  Despair is not acceptable, but it may be inevitable. Social democrats are the world's optimists, knowing human destiny is in our own hands if we have the will to change. Leave pessimism to the world's conservatives, ever fearful of the future and yearning for a better yesterday. But today optimism feels impossible. The chance of world leaders preventing a more than 2C increase in temperature looks vanishingly small- by Polly Toynbee . . read more
Greening Capitalism: David Blood
8 aug  |  Even amongst those who accept that we’re facing a time of monumental change, one question niggles about the change ahead: what’s it all going to cost? Some say less than the price of a coffee a week, some that reducing emissions will mean considerable costs and a loss of economic competitiveness. How do you make sure good climate strategy equals good business? Does systemic change represent as great an opportunity as it does a challenge? . . read more
Coral reefs and climate change: A message for Copenhagen
14 dec  |  Coral reefs and climate change: A message for Copenhagen  . . read more
Terrifying Visions of the Future
1 nov  |  The United Nations' latest report on the state of the planet reminds us just how badly the environment is faring, and warns that governments are still failing to recognise the seriousness of major environmental issues. Perhaps this confirms that it takes more than statistics to make real the unkind future we risk handing down to our children.  . . read more
Paradigm in Progress PART ONE
24 jun  | 
The past year was not just one of economic turmoil. Across our increasingly hot and crowded planet people are reacting in sundry, yet mostly conventional ways, to the effects of global heating. Here is what global futurist Richard David Hames has to say on the subject.
 . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)