Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
Tropical Cyclone Tomas slams Fiji
Video
Dan Barber: How I fell in love with a fish
Blog
Comic Bill Hicks Posthumously Rocks Austin
Game
Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight
Art
"Ganesh Spirits" by Günther Gheeraert
Cool tools
Hot links

Super Mario Flash Game Restyled for Obama

Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
THE PARABLE AND PARADOX OF SANTA HENRY. By Eugene Elander

It's not long until Christmas, and throughout our fair land, Santa Henry's soon coming, with largesse in his hand; Every lender and bank, whether naughty or nice, Has Santa Henry to thank, as each grabs his own slice. 

It's certainly true that U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson doesn't look much like the traditional depiction of Santa Claus.  However, in 2008 America he is playing that role with a vengeance which will undoubtedly affect and afflict all of us for decades to come.  Indeed, Santa Henry's trillion-dollar giveaway to those who caused much of the present financial crisis is already arriving.  While it may seem paradoxical, not to mention inappropriate, to reward those who got us into the present economic mess, Santa Henry is loyal to his former Wall Street colleagues, investment bankers, and other assorted cronies.  They are Santa Henry's Elves, in a manner of speaking.

Consider that Santa Henry's case for this trillion-dollar-plus bailout (it's occurring in stages to make it look smaller, but we should know better) changed totally recently.

He had advocated for most of the Fall of 2008 the need for the U.S. Treasury over which he presides to buy up "toxic assets" such as bad and unwise loans made by the financial sector, to rescue those financial institutions from their own greed and bad decisions.  The U.S. Congress was panicked into giving him his way, to the tune of the larger part of that trillion dollars, under threat of a total financial meltdown if Congress did not comply.

As the weeks passed after Santa Henry got his way on the first round of the bailout, some of us began to wonder what was being done with such an unbelievable amount of money.

Little effect was seen: homeowners were still losing their homes, companies were still going belly up, while financial institutions such as AIG staged lavish celebrations fueled in part with bailout money.  It has been much like rewarding the fox for eating the hens.

But just when hard questions began to be asked, and left unanswered, by Santa Henry and other bailout advocates and leaders, we were treated to an astounding press conference.

Santa Henry told us that he and his ilk were not in fact going to use that good old trillion dollars to buy up toxic assets, bad loans, and other remnants of the incompetence of the leaders of our financial sectors.  No, Santa Henry had seen a new light, a new unholy grail to pursue, while stating blithely that he would never be one to fail to change his mind when confronted with new "facts" - facts largely of his own creation, of course.

Now, Santa Henry has had a new vision, an epiphany, a revelation......you get the idea.  He will use that trillion-or-so-dollars to buy stock and other ownership interests in our financial sector, making the U.S. government a partner with those who failed to watch their own stores in the first place.  His new approach is somewhat like the fox buying a part interest in the henhouse from the weasels. 

Santa Henry alleges that the former approach, the one Congress reluctantly approved, would just be too slow to meet the worsening economic and financial crises in the UnitedStates.  This implies that he must believe that buying part interests in financial firms represents a faster bailout, although why he would think that is another paradox.  After all, once the financial sector has our trillion dollars (more will come from horrendous U.S. public debt increases than from already-strapped taxpayers), why should they use that money to save our financial system?  Obviously, our economic gurus, having ignored the worsening home loan crisis for years, and then having failed to act on all the other signs of economic malaise such as massive job losses and the record low in consumer confidence, have neither the ability nor the will to propose realistic solutions.

What is really needed, for starters, would be a thorough review of relevant history, such as FDR's New Deal, the historic World War II Bretton Woods monetary conference, and even the history of the 1980s savings-and-loan crisis and that bailout in the United States.

We could also learn a great deal from how other nations, such as Sweden, have handled their own banking and financial crises.  There are undoubtedly solutions to the present short-term financial emergency and long-term economic malaise facing the United States.

Finding and utilizing those solutions must become a major focus for our nation, and in particular for the incoming Obama Administration.  We must engage our best and our brightest minds to solve our financial and economic problems. The historical track record of presidents from FDR to Truman to Eisenhower to Kennedy to Ford to Clinton proves that solutions do exist and can be implemented by competent people of good will.

Such solutions are unlikely to be found or implemented by Santa Henry, however; his Elves played a major role in creating our economic and financial problems.  Santa Henry's newfound approach, like his immediate previous one, is much like the fox dividing up the henhouse and giving it, along with the chickens, to the wolves and the weasels.   Meanwhile, another set of chickens is coming home to roost at Santa Henry's door - and at our doors also, if we fail to act effectively, and very soon.

View the pageGo back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
In the last few days I have been researching a political organisation known as the nationalist alternative. From their ideologies it is not hard to jump from ultra conservative white-only party to radical neo-nazi party. I realised that many opposed to such racist groups are looking into a violent mirror. The nationalist alternative was attacked aggressively at an anti internet censorship rally in South Australia, a video on slackbastard depicted multicultural groups stomping the white only protestors heads, the lyrics to a song by Skarharrper called "nazi scum" has the lyrics "we gotta beat em in the street, there's a time to fight and that time has come, we're comin for ya nazi scum". How does one defend minorities by violently attacking one?
Find out about our Widget

Feedback

4 mar

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

*********************************

Why has homepage started running so many nameless 100 word eds? Names are good for intellectual continuity, honesty and non-hypocrisy. - Terry McGee

*********************************

Re: Bale de Rua

We thought the Bale de Rua was aweful. Choreography was terrible - set design, music and costumes were lacklustre. The dancers however were very athletic and graceful. - Jules

*********************************

Re: In Praise of Mediocrity

I just wonder who decides if what ever you chose to do in life, is mediocre or not. Sounds like with standards like yours, this article with its poor structure and soap box appeal may also be considered by many as, in-fact, mediocre. - Khedra

*********************************

Re: The Assassins of Langley

Yes, Mr. Neville. Odious, heinous assassins sold body and soul to Luciferian entities who pull the strings (the last of them, I want to believe) from the shadows. Philip Aggeee and John Stockwell portrayed them quite well. They are NOT heroes, nor are the gangbangers of East Los Angeles who spray grafitti in Iraq, where they most certainly train for urban warfare on our streets. Good riddance to them all!

*********************************

Re: Hairy Legs: A Study of Female Art, Feminism and Femininity

 Looking forward to more of her articles. Hope she does plenty of Art Theory at SCA. Barbara Kruger and Judy Chicago are certainly powerful artists and it would be interesting to see what they are doing now.

*********************************

A hero's welcome for the famous Iraqi shoe thrower

Terrorist! Please do your research first before writing such dangerous things, we was insulting Bush by throwing the shoe as he was disgraced with him, not trying to topple the largest super power in the world by throwing a shoe. I cant believe you have put those words up. Ashamed

*********************************

Re: How to Report the News

Having worked as a TV news reporter I found Charlie's piece very amusing - some of us have long believed reporting like this is a rubbish way to do things! But even if a journalist wants to tell stories in a more authentic and engaging way, the constraints of the so-called "house style" in many news organisations make it difficult to achieve. What's needed is a massive culture shift and a complete re-think of what we understand quality broadcast news reporting is. And guess what? That's exactly what's happening, though you'd never believe it from what we're still mostly seeing on TV. Anyway, the new digital technologies, and shake up of "old school/old mainstream" journalism means new platforms and styles of "news" storytelling can now emerge. Let's hope fresh and appropriate ways of funding appear too, so we can kill off this dreadful formulaic reporting and delivery, and clear the way for more natural and interesting ways to treat stories and content.

Much love, Ian Aspin.
www.twitter.com/ianaspin

*********************************

Re: Pushing 60 With Pot

You're pushing 60, well I'm pushing 70 and still having to scrounge around for my pot. It's tragic that when I first came to Australia it was $30 an ounce, and now I have to pay nearly $350 - Peter

 *********************************

Re: Textbook publishers dream of the tablet

Why can't this just be a program for PC and Windows? Why do they have to make us buy more hardware that's just going to disappoint? - Tyler J. Wilson

*********************************

Re: Killing Indian Students: Australia's Favourite New Sport!- by Sean Maguire

How about the indian guy who slashed his wife's throat, is still australia to blame for?..may be , for accenpting them to move over!I am an immigrant myself but I love this country, there is no perfect place on Earth but australia is one of the best! - Michael

*********************************
 
 
This entire fiasco is an incredible over reaction. Australia is an easy target. Why? because we are honest, transperant and we talk about our failings. Is there aggression and iolence in Australia? Sure, like any country. But we face it head on and we work to eliminate it. What about the stories of the 100’s of thousands of Indian workers who are treated as slaves in the middle east and nobody says anything? What about the fact that India still has entrenched pedophilia in terms of child brides? What about the crushing poverty embraced by more than 60% of the Indian people while this nation runs around building nuclear warheads? A storm in a teacup, an over reaction, and a diversion from some the really bad issues facing India. What is really happening here is that students are being unnecessarily frightened. meaning they will miss out on what could be the opportunity of their lifetime. - Daryl
 
*********************************
 
 
I couldn't agree with Sean Maguire's article more on the recent Indian attacks. For all those who like the pretend the attacks are merely based on coincidence, try to imagine how we would react if the boot were on the other foot and an uncharacteristic number of Australia's had been murdered in India. Would you push for a travel ban? Would you be scared for your children in a seemingly hostile environment so many miles away?  - Kara Jensen-Mackinnon

*********************************
 
12 sep
10 aug
More feedback...
© 2007-2008 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us