Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Labor Can't See the Wood for the Trees
Federal Labor leader Kevin Rudd's pledge not to protect any more of the Tasmania's forests from logging if he wins the election confirms he lacks the leadership credentials Australia badly needs to build a sustainable future. SARAH BARNS reports.

Spotting the difference between Rudd and Howard is proving something of an eyestrain. A befuddled reporter who'd given up trying was treated to the hyperbole of long term impacts and proper science from a man who clearly doesn't mind hacking down the odd old growth forest here and there to clear his path to The Lodge.

Rudd's latest announcement might be good politics, but it's poor public policy delivered at the expense of our future generations. 

Rudd's stance on Tasmanian forests suggests he doesn't have the tough leadership credentials Australia needs to steer this country toward a sustainable future. Is this a leader who can pursuade the electorate that reducing carbon emissions is going cost mortgage-paying individuals? Who can pursuade Australia's carbon lobby that some of our oldest and most profitable industries are going to have to make way for cleaner energy alternatives? It's not looking likely. 

As the Tasmanian Greens have pointed out: “What is needed here is leadership and the understanding that we can protect remaining areas of high conservation value forests that are currently on the chopping block, creating jobs in tourism as we go and making a transition to a modern non-conflictive forest industry using the oodles of available wood that is non-contentious.” 

One hopes Labor's environmental spokesperson Peter 'Principled Pete' Garrett, long time Tasmanian forest campaigner alongside Greens Senator Bob Brown, is feeling the dud he is right now. When he addressed the National Press Club as in 2003 as head of the Australian Conservation Foundation, Peter Garrett claimed "With national leadership in sustainability reforms, looking after the environment is not an obstacle, instead it can be a driver of our economy." 

He went on: "Increasingly people talk about the economic cost of not protecting the environment. They see good environmental policies as common sense and they understand the issues as never before." 

Labor's latest announcement is poor public policy, and poor on leadership. Spare a thought for poor Pete? Not likely. 

Image: Peaceful protests in the Upper Florentine Valley, Tasmania, courtesy of sydneyindymedia

 

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
It Was Ruddy Boring At The Labor Party Conference
30 jul  |   Prime-Minister Kevin Rudd was at the Labor National Conference today talking at length about his Government's various achievements.  What was made painfully clear by his speech was that his leadership has been mired by giving enormous promises, (still awaiting my education revolution) but delivering poorly - By Sean Maguire  . . read more
The Greens Daisy Ad
19 nov  |  In 1964, under the threat of nuclear war, U.S. President Johnson released a controversial TV ad called the daisy ad. It played only once but had a dramatic effect. With the threat of catastrophic climate change, The Greens remade the ad for the Australian election. . . read more
Australian Political Pulp Fiction
15 oct  |  Australian politicians battle it out over election issues such as the Tasmanian pulp mill. Staring Malcolm Turnbull, Minister for the Exploitation of the Environment, outgoing PM Howard and Tony Abbott as the Mad Monk. . . read more
NSW red gum logging defies Federal environment law
28 jun  |  NSW red gum logging defies Federal environment law . . read more
To Budget on the Environment
11 may  | 

By Sean Maguire

From your grey-to-change citizen of ambivalence, to your hug a tree hippie- the last few weeks have been depressing for Australian environmentalists of every hue.

Last night with the release of Rudd's third Budget their concerns seem amplified.

The CPRS has been shelved till 2012, $238 million has been cut from the Department of Climate Change and local projects such as Landcare have lost millions from their budgets. 

So as pundits praise Rudd's prudency and restraint remember that he's pushing back the changes that will soon be inevitable and making them all the more impossible to achieve.

 

 . . read more
Who Do You Trust on Climate Change?
31 oct  |  Both major parties in Australia seem split and confused on how to handle the future challenges of climate change. The Greens want you to vote for real change at the election. . . read more
No Word From Labor on E-Bikes - From Terry D. McGee
23 jun  |  It's been a week now since e-bikes were made illegal by the NSW Supreme Court and there has been no word, no contact from the Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett (or from Penny Wong, or the NSW Govt) to the people caught up in this mess - Deborah Matheson who was originally convicted and Trevor Patrick whose business has been destroyed.

The simple point again is the environment needs as many people as possible to change from car use as soon as possible and that's what e-bikes (electric assisted bikes) are helping. The immediate reduction of CO2 creation is a Federal issue and past members of Federal Parliament have acted as human beings even if their party wants them to shut up. This issue will be taken to the Court of Appeal and Garrett, being a lawyer, could play his part in the legal team. Do I hear his people saying ‘he can't do that'? Yes, he can if he cares about things that matter. Does he? His office could have responded to the detailed submission that Trevor Patrick has sent them or at least ring him but they haven't.

In California the right wing Republican Governor is actually subsidizing the sale of e-bikes while here in Australia Labor governments are letting them be pushed off the road. The environment should be more important than the Supreme Court.

 . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)