Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
A helicopter view of the Gillard Government
A helicopter view of the Gillard Government

Fairfax political journalist Michelle Grattan stated on Radio National last week that Australians are unlikely to take the all-encompassing 'helicopter' view at the next election. And this, despite the 300 pieces of new legislation achieved so far by the Gillard Government under the extremely challenging conditions of a minority government.

Instead of focusing on the overview of this remarkable achievement, these citizens will be bogged down in the detail of one scandalous union funds abuse, the misbehaviour of another high profile government official and the alleged impact of some new progressive taxes on their personal lives.

It has become the fashion to trade negative remarks about the other side of politics but this takes us nowhere. Better to contemplate the advantages of Grattan's 'helicopter view' which is very like the concern of the Canadian political philosopher, John Ralston Saul, about the proliferation of 'experts' in the conduct of affairs in the West.

Article published on Eurekastreet- to read more or for further information click link 

 

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Gaddafi going to go like a dictator
22 aug  |  By Stephen Myles

With the Gaddafi regime on the verge of collapse, the world is waiting for the money shot - an image of a shackled or dead dictator paraded through the streets as a lowly criminal.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard wants to see more, she wants to see the man brought before an international criminal court; a nice thought but looking through the history of fallen dictators, let's just say "justice" is pretty unlikely to happen.

Dead, deposed or distant is all you really have to hope for, so let's hope too much blood isn't spilled in getting one of these results.

 

   . . read more

Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
13 jun  |  Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics . . read more
Penny Feels the Heat
14 aug  |  Australian Minister for Climate Change Penny Wong, along with the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre's Dr Ben McNeil, try to explain government policy at a recent climate change forum in Sydney.  . . read more
Bob Brown on election politics and the Greens: With Robert Manne
21 aug  |  Bob Brown on election politics and the Greens: With Robert Manne . . read more
Australia: The One Party State- by Sean Maguire
26 nov  |  As the Coalition implodes, Australia is at risk of becoming a country without a viable opposition- a country ruled by a select few that pledge allegiance to one leader.

Now some will say it's an exaggeration to suggest that this marks Australia's evolution to a one party state.

But how else can you define the last week?

For instance, the CPRS has been debated rigorously behind closed doors with Turnbull taking credit for amendments that will supposedly save thousands of jobs whilst still protecting the environment. Yet, his party's and the media's response, has been to focus on internal bickerings and leadership spills. 

Ignoring any work Turnbull did.

This has basically led to Rudd's little legislative baby being seen as his accomplishment- a dangerous precedent that will allow him to distort future debates based on 'his' successes. It will also allow him to claim the mandate of the people as the opposition's opinion polls drop and they as a party become even more dispirited.  

Without a balance and without real debate, we should be scared.

 

 

 

  . . read more

An Australian Apology: Why the Greens Should Vote for the CPRS- by Derek Barry
30 nov  |  An Australian Apology: Why the Greens Should Vote for the CPRS- by Derek Barry . . read more
Vietnam War: Not Dead History
26 aug  |  By Stephen Myles

The Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, came out last week and made two gaffes at the Vietnam War Remembrance Day. The first was when she said that General Giap, Vietnam's iconic war hero, was dead. The second was when she said that the Vietnam War "is just a page in the history books".

Some of the actors might have passed on (not Giap, who turned 100 yesterday) but the history isn't dead. 

For the Vietnamese it hangs over everything, appearing in literallly every single state owned newspaper every day as if it happened yesterday. For veterans on either side it also seems inconsiderate to consign it to dead history, it is very much a living memory and it will live on, long after they've gone.

Maybe it would have been better to remember them by not saying it was time to forget.  . . read more

Gillard's chaplaincy challenge
3 aug  |  Gillard's chaplaincy challenge . . read more
The year that wasn't, and why you're to blame
22 dec  |  When we look back over 2009 it will probably be remembered as a year that wasn't- a year that offered promises of change, hope and optimism but delivered zilch. Let's look at why- by Sean Maguire  . . read more
Keating breaches the Abbott-Proof-Fence- by Sean Maguire
16 mar  |  For even the most casual watcher of Australian politics the last few months have been depressing.

Tony Abbott, the self-styled ideological love-child of Bronwyn Bishop and John Howard has been playing some pretty petty party politics; stone-walling any Labor policy, regardless of its merits.

So step up Paul Keating, the ideological love-child of a brick wall and Jack Lang.

He has launched a vicious and burning attack on Abbott calling him an "intellectual nobody [with] no policy ambition", and the "poor man's John Howard".

Hard to disagree with, and hard to see how Abbott will slip out of the shadow of the anodyne if he doesn't start voting with Australia's, and not his interests in mind.  . . read more

blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)