Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
HPD: Marches for Marijuana. Legalisation to save lives?

Around the world over the weekend there were hundreds of marches organised to promote the legalisation of marijuana. They were no more strong and pertinent than in Mexico where the question of the legalisation (or the decriminalisation) of cannabis is intimately linked to the burgeoning drug trade - by Sean Maguire


Today we want to open the discussion about whether legalising the drug should be considered as a means to starve traffickers and dealers of funds and focus the attention of the authorities on the sale and distribution of other more serious substances.

The situation as it stands today is that 38,000 people in Mexico are dead after an almost 5 year fight against drug traffickers.

It is a moot point in Mexico whether the fight against "narcotraficantes" should continue.

Many within Mexico believe that they shouldn't have to take the bloodshed because the consumption of the drugs is done abroad. It's a view that has traction seeing that until 5 years ago the Mexican government virtually ignored trafficking - allowing the cartels to grow strong and establish a largely working peace where territories were clearly marked out and agreed on.

A situation that dissolved once the army was sent to fight against the cartels - some of which were 70 years old - creating disorder about where and how they could operate and also creating the now very familiar bloody fights for territory.

Others believe that the government (which a lot of people see as corrupt and ineffective) should fight harder against the traffickers and that they should be entirely stamped out so that Mexico's reputation can be restored and its government can focus its energy on more endemic problems like poverty.

Others still are just sick of the constant cycle of death and violence that is reported daily in grisly pictures in the country's newspapers.

The point is that somehow this has to stop.

The second point is while cocaine might be newsworthy, experts have estimated that the majority of the cartels' revenue comes from marijuana.

NPR explains that "in part [it is] because the Mexican gangs control the production, trafficking and distribution of the drug. The cocaine they move has a higher street value, but they initially have to buy it from the Colombians."

So if Mexico "sends almost all of its crops to the U.S" and if the drug makes more revenue funding the cartels, wouldn't it be prudent for the Mexican government to make some money off it and pressure the U.S to stop consumption?

What do you think of the idea of marijuana legalisation as a way to take power away from Mexico's cartels? Should the problem be pushed on to the United States who consumes the drugs? Tell us and remember....Disqus! 

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Drug tests carried out in city pubs by hand swabs
31 may  |  Drug tests carried out in city pubs by hand swabs . . read more
Drug War Update: Sovereignty
31 may  | 

Ethan Nadelmann, Executive Director of the Drug Policy Alliance, talks about individual rights and how the war on drugs oversteps those bounds.

What do you think of the argument of individual rights in the issue of drugs? Should people have the right to ingest whatever they want as long as they don't hurt anyone? Tell us and remember...Disqus!

 . . read more
40th Anniversary of the War Against Drugs
20 jun  |  By Stephen Myles

This week marks the 40th anniversary of Richard Nixon declaring a war against drugs - a declaration which has led to a trillion dollars being spent, millions being arrested for possession and trafficking and families torn apart.

To put it simply, this week marks the point where an aggressive fight to create a global prohibition against so many substances started. 

A decision and war that clearly hasn't worked - narcotics are at the cheapest and most available levels they ever been and consumption is at similarly high record levels. 

Harsh punishments and a war mentality have only exacerbated the problem.

40 years on it's time for a cease fire.

What do you think of the war against drugs and the anniversary this week marks? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

The World's Most Wanted Man
17 jun  |  A few months it was easy to name the world's most wanted man, with a swift execution in Pakistan that all changed and every bad guy jostling for the top position moved up a number.

The question for today though is who, according to the FBI and Interpol, is the new number one? - by Sean Maguire

 

  . . read more

Conventional wisdom and a drug war
14 jun  |  By Don Reilly

As Mexico's long running drug war has evolved from the tragic, to the farcical and now to the absolutely idiotic, there have been few changes in how to address the problem.

More police and more military to catch the leaders of the cartels, tough penalties for trafficking.

Conventional wisdom would say that doing more of these activites and dealing out harsher sentences would dissuade the drug trade.

Conventional wisdom though is flawed, it's conventional because it's based on what's happened before - yet, what has happened before hasn't worked.

Why would doing more of it make it better?

There are other solutions 

Decriminilisation?

Logically though drug use might increase, leading to other problems to appear.

A radical solution might be really tough penalties on consumption.

Would you think twice about lighting up a joint if it led to a $25,000 fine and a 5 year jail sentence?

Would you snort a line if it resulted in your nose being cut off?

Might not be accepted by the wider public and might not be conventional, but conventional wisdom hasn't really proved to be wise so far.

What do you think of this unconventional idea? Is conventional wisdom wise? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

Assange: Facebook, Google, Yahoo spying tools for US intelligence
4 may  |  Julian Assange, the infamous head of WikiLeaks is interviewed here by Russia Today; he talks about the Spring Revolution in the Middle-East and then moves on to slam Facebook - saying it's "the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented". He goes on to say that "Facebook, Google, Yahoo...have built in interfaces for U.S intelligence", that "they have automated the process" of passing on information and that when people add their friends "they are doing free work for United States intelligence agencies.

Has this changed your perspective on Facebook, Google and Yahoo? Will you be deleting your accounts any time soon? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

TYTN: Pentagon - U.S. Overspending On Defense
30 apr  |  TYTN: Pentagon - U.S. Overspending On Defense . . read more
Cheap Trick Mariachi Mash Up: "Surrender for Hornitos™ Tequila"
6 may  |  Cheap Trick Mariachi Mash Up: "Surrender for Hornitos™ Tequila" . . read more
Plan Colombia for Mexico
16 sep  |  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated Wednesday that Mexico and Central America were facing an “insurgency” that requires the equivalent of a Plan Colombia in the region. Her comments immediately raised the ire of the Mexican government and sparked fears of expanded U.S. military intervention- by Laura Carlsen
 . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)