Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Obama’s Secret Money Smear
Obama’s Secret Money Smear

By Alan W. Dowd

In an effort to limit the damage from what promises to be a political tsunami in November, President Obama and his surrogates are smearing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Republican candidates for accepting “secret foreign money,” according to a DNC ad, and contributions from “foreign-owned corporations,” according to the president.

This is nothing more than a tempest in a teapot—and one overflowing with a toxic mix of hypocrisy and cynicism—for lots of reasons. But here are just a few.

First, in the president’s smearing of the Chamber’s legitimate involvement in the political process and in his deriding of money from “the oil industry” and “the insurance industry” as “a threat to our democracy,” there is an implication that money in politics is inherently evil and that he somehow has transcended this sin.

We’ll address the latter in a moment, but on the matter of money in politics, it pays to recall that money and what it can buy have always played a role in U.S. politics.

In 1757, as he ran for a seat in the Virginia House of Burgesses, George Washington spent a small fortune on rum and whiskey. The book Money Matters estimates that he bought more than a quart of liquor per voter in that first campaign. He won, thanks in part to this special campaign expense. James Madison refused to follow Washington’s example in his bid for re-election to the same body. Perhaps predictably, he lost.

Originally published at Front Page Magazine- the official student newspaper of UC Berkeley- click the link to read more or for more information.

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
U.S in Libya: Get shot by your own bullets
22 mar  |  By Sean Maguire

There are few people in this world who would defend Gaddafi as a sane and viable leader of Libya; but I think there would be even less that would see the logic in the U.S selling guns to someone as psychotic as him and then parading about as world police.

It's the equivalent of a sheriff giving an outlaw a six-shooter and then acting surprised when he starts popping off the town folk. 

The second one U.S plane gets shot down by one U.S surface-to-air missile, all the military big wigs should get together and make a decision once and for all - "we have to stop shooting at tyrants we've given guns to".

What do you think about Libya? What do you think about the obvious contradictions in U.S foreign policy and how do you think they should be addressed? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

U.S. Leading The Terror In Afghanistan
13 aug  |  U.S. Leading The Terror In Afghanistan . . read more
Will We Heed President Obama's Call for a More Empathic Society?
14 jan  |  Will We Heed President Obama's Call for a More Empathic Society? . . read more
Something you can bank on- by Sean Maguire
22 jan  |  It was hilarious.

Almost exactly a year ago- as the global financial crisis was at its most threatening- a friend and I went to a talk at the Adam Smith Institute.

The main speaker- a very forgettable Conservative MP- extoled the value of the free market and market liberalisation while most sensible pundits and politicians were dipping into socialist economics for capitalism's salvation.

After the talk we stayed around to drink champagne, eat canapes and talk to some girls but we were interrupted by some cartoonish toffs.

They (and then the director of the institute) continued the discussion about the virtues of the free market, with the director almost pleading with us to believe that this was a credit crisis and not a failing of his beloved theory. 

Looking at Obama's banking reforms, it seems Mr Free Market is looking even more the fool.

Obama has sought to separate investment and commercial banks, and is trying to strip 'too big to fail' from the corporate lexicon. 

It seems in the land where the free market was the closest to conquering sense, that sense has finally hit back. 

And hopefully is set to stay.   . . read more

U.S Joins US- by Sean Maguire
23 mar  |  It's a piece of legislation that Teddy Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, Bill and Hillary Clinton couldn't get passed, a Bill that has widened a deep ideological chasm all over the country and given those Mad-Hatters at the Tea Party more mercury to sniff.

In short it's a history making moment for Obama that will define him.

So I'd like to say, as a citizen of one those countries that has lived with the dangers of socialised medicine for years, as a citizen of a country that has watched the twists and turns of U.S politics with increasing exasparation, and as a citizen of a country that can't understand why universal healthcare hasn't existed for decades-

Welcome to world of sanity you selfish fucks.  . . read more

Obama’s Anti-Prosperity Crusade
10 oct  |  Obama’s Anti-Prosperity Crusade . . read more
Why Indefinite Detention By Executive Order Should Scare the Hell Out of People
24 dec  |  Quigley and Warren write about a distrubing development in US legal history. As they say:

"The right to liberty is one of the foundation rights of a free people.  The idea  that any US President can bypass Congress and bypass the Courts by issuing an  Executive Order setting up a new legal system for indefinite detention of people  should rightfully scare the hell out of the American people. Advisors in the Obama administration have floated the idea of creating a special  new legal system to indefinitely detain people by Executive Order."

With the goal being to clean up the Guantanamo Bay disaster, Quigley and Warren argue that this is by no means a solution and it may even be worse. Click the link to read more at Counter Punch.  . . read more

Is a Government Shutdown Imminent?
28 feb  |  Regarding the possiblitity of a Congressional debate on raising the debt limit devolving into a 1995-style government shutdown, Office of Management and Budget Director Jacob Lew notes that both Republican and Democratic leaders have "made it clear" that such a result would "not [be] a good thing." Lew, who was on the negotiating team that helped reach a bipartisan agreement to balance the budget under Clinton, said "that's very different from where we were in the 1990's." . . read more
Why the world should know how they're manning Bradley
29 mar  |  By Stephen Myles

With Berlusconi before the courts and with Libya's war pornography helping the world get off, it's easy to forget that there's a 23 year old kid sitting in solitary confinement facing life imprisonment.

Bradley Manning, the U.S private accused of leaking 720,000 documents to WikiLeaks has been forgotten; he's not getting Assange like fame or reverence, or an Assange like house arrest.

Instead he's been shackled, alone in a cell and very often disrobed so he doesn't harm himself.  

Whether you agree with what he did or not, we have to remember that he's a U.S citizen, we have to remember what rights he has, and we have to remember what terrible long years he faces alone. 

We have to remember him.   . . read more

Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama’s mind on offshore drilling?
2 may  |  Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama’s mind on offshore drilling? . . read more
blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)